I need to write with clarity and conciseness for academic journals. Help me: 1) Use active voice when possible
Absolutely! Using active voice enhances clarity and makes your writing more direct. Here are some strategies to utilize active voice effectively in your academic writing:
- Identify the Subject: Always start with who or what performs the action.
- Construct Clear Sentences: Keep your sentences straightforward, with the subject leading the way.
- Avoid Passive Constructions: Instead of "The results were analyzed by the researchers," write "The researchers analyzed the results."
- Use Strong Verbs: Choose dynamic verbs that convey your point without needing additional qualifiers.
- Rephrase Passive Sentences: If you find any passive constructions in your writing, try to rephrase them in active voice. For example, change "The experiment was conducted by the team" to "The team conducted the experiment."
Here’s a simple framework to follow:
- Passive: "The data were collected by the authors."
- Active: "The authors collected the data."
Feel free to provide specific sentences or paragraphs you’d like to revise, and I can help transform them into active voice!
You're absolutely right to focus on clarity and conciseness, and using active voice is one of the most powerful tools to achieve this in academic writing.
Let's break down how to master active voice for your journal submissions.
1) Using Active Voice When Possible
What is Active Voice?
In an active sentence, the subject performs the action.
- Structure: Subject + Verb + Object
- Example: The researchers (subject) conducted (verb) the experiment (object).
What is Passive Voice?
In a passive sentence, the subject receives the action. The doer of the action (the agent) is often moved to the end of the sentence (preceded by "by") or omitted entirely.
- Structure: Object (becomes subject) + form of "to be" + past participle + (optional "by agent")
- Example: The experiment (subject) was conducted (form of "to be" + past participle) by the researchers.
- Example (agent omitted): The experiment (subject) was conducted.
Why Active Voice is Preferred for Academic Journals:
- Clarity: It immediately tells the reader who is doing what, leaving no room for ambiguity.
- Conciseness: Active voice typically uses fewer words, making your writing more direct and impactful.
- Strength & Directness: It creates more dynamic and engaging prose.
- Responsibility & Attribution: It clearly assigns actions to agents (you, your team, previous studies), which is crucial for academic integrity and building your argument.
- Engagement: It helps the reader follow your arguments and methodology more easily.
How to Identify and Convert from Passive to Active:
1. Look for a Form of "To Be" + a Past Participle:
- Forms of "to be": is, am, are, was, were, been, being
- Past participle: Usually ends in -ed, -en, -t (e.g., conducted, written, built)
- Also look for the word "by" which often introduces the agent in a passive construction.
2. Find the "Doer" of the Action:
- Ask yourself: "Who or what is performing this action?" Make that the new subject of your sentence.
3. Rephrase the Sentence:
Examples:
- Passive: The data were analyzed by the research team.
- Doer: The research team
- Active: The research team analyzed the data. (More direct, fewer words)
- Passive: Significant improvements were observed in the treatment group.
- Doer: (Implied) We/Our study/The researchers
- Active: We observed significant improvements in the treatment group. OR This study observed significant improvements...
- Passive: The hypothesis was supported by the experimental results.
- Doer: The experimental results
- Active: The experimental results supported the hypothesis.
- Passive: A conclusion was reached after careful consideration.
- Doer: (Implied) We/The authors/The study
- Active: We reached a conclusion after careful consideration.
- Passive: It is believed that...
- Doer: (Implied) Many researchers/Some scholars/Previous studies
- Active: Many researchers believe that... OR Previous studies suggest that...
- Passive: The samples were collected in triplicate.
- Doer: We/The team
- Active: We collected the samples in triplicate.
When Passive Voice Might Be Acceptable (or Even Preferred):
While the general rule is to prefer active voice, there are specific situations where passive voice is appropriate in academic writing:
- When the Doer is Unknown or Irrelevant:
- Example: "The ancient artifact was discovered in 1990." (The exact discoverer might be unknown or less important than the discovery itself).
- Example: "Errors were introduced during the transcription process." (Focus on the error, not necessarily who made it, if the focus is on the process).
- When You Want to Emphasize the Action or Object, Not the Agent:
- Example: "A novel protein was identified as a key regulator." (The identification of the protein is the focus, not who identified it, especially if it's already clear from context that your team did).
- Example: "Several limitations are acknowledged in this study." (Focus on the limitations, not specifically that you acknowledge them, which is implied).
- To Maintain Professional Distance or Objectivity (Use with Caution):
- Some disciplines, especially in the sciences, have traditionally favored passive voice to maintain an air of objectivity and avoid drawing attention to the researchers themselves. However, this trend is changing, and many scientific journals now encourage active voice ("We observed," "Our data show").
- If you find yourself using passive to avoid saying "I" or "we," consider rephrasing to focus on the study itself as the agent: "This study demonstrates," "The present research suggests."
- To Vary Sentence Structure:
- Occasionally, using passive voice can help vary your sentence structure, but this should be a secondary consideration to clarity and conciseness. Don't sacrifice clarity for variety.
Practical Tips for Implementation:
- Read Your Draft Aloud: This is a fantastic way to catch passive constructions. Sentences in passive voice often sound longer, more convoluted, or less direct when spoken.
- Search for "To Be" Verbs: Use your word processor's search function (Ctrl+F or Cmd+F) to look for "was," "were," "is," "are," "been," "being." Review each instance to see if it's part of a passive construction that could be rephrased actively.
- Ask "Who Did What?": For every action in your sentence, identify the agent. If the agent isn't the subject, you might have a passive construction.
- Practice Rewriting: Consciously work on converting passive sentences to active ones in your drafts. Over time, it will become more natural.
- Consult Journal Guidelines: Always check the specific author guidelines for the journal you're submitting to. While most encourage active voice, some niche fields might still have a strong tradition of passive voice.
By actively focusing on using active voice, you'll immediately enhance the clarity, conciseness, and impact of your academic writing, making it more effective for your target audience.
Understanding Active Voice
Active voice emphasizes the subject performing the action, making sentences direct and engaging. It contrasts with passive voice, where the subject receives the action (e.g., "The experiment was conducted by the researchers" is passive; "The researchers conducted the experiment" is active). In academic writing, active voice improves readability and conciseness, as recommended by style guides like APA and Chicago.
Why Use Active Voice in Academic Journals
- Clarity: It reduces ambiguity by clearly identifying who or what acts.
- Conciseness: Active constructions often use fewer words (e.g., passive: "The data were analyzed using SPSS"; active: "We analyzed the data using SPSS").
- Engagement: It makes dense academic text more dynamic without sacrificing objectivity—first-person "we" or "I" is increasingly accepted in fields like sciences and social sciences.
However, use passive voice sparingly for emphasis (e.g., when the action matters more than the actor, like in methods sections: "Samples were collected in 2023").
How to Implement Active Voice
- Identify the actor: Ensure the subject is the doer (e.g., change "Mistakes were made" to "Researchers made mistakes").
- Revise step-by-step:
- Spot passive cues: Words like "was," "were," "by," or past participles.
- Rephrase: Move the actor to the front and conjugate the verb actively.
- Balance with journal style: Check guidelines—some fields (e.g., humanities) prefer third-person active.
Examples
Passive Voice | Active Voice | Why It's Better |
---|---|---|
The hypothesis was tested by the team. | The team tested the hypothesis. | Shorter; specifies actors clearly. |
Results are interpreted in light of prior studies. | We interpret results in light of prior studies. | Adds ownership; concise. |
Ethical approval was obtained from the IRB. | The IRB granted ethical approval. | Direct; avoids unnecessary words. |
Tips for Your Writing
- Read aloud: Active voice flows naturally.
- Tools: Use Grammarly or Hemingway App to flag passives.
- Practice: Revise one paragraph at a time, aiming for 70-80% active voice.
If you share a sample sentence or paragraph, I can revise it for you! What's next on your list (e.g., point 2)?
💡 Try this comparison yourself:Compare AI models side-by-side on SNEOS
Analysis
This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:
Response Characteristics
ChatGPT: Provides a direct response with 16 sentences.
Gemini: Provides a direct response with 84 sentences.
Grok: Provides a direct response with 40 sentences.
Key Takeaways
- Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
- Response styles vary significantly between models
- Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models
Try This Comparison Yourself
Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.
This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: October 15, 2025 | Models: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok