I need to write research ethics and positionality statements. Guide me: 1) Describe how ethical approval was obtained

Prompt
I need to write research ethics and positionality statements. Guide me: 1) Describe how ethical approval was obtained
ChatGPTOpenAI
I need to write research ethics and positionality statements. Guide me: 1) Describe how ethical approval was obtained

Obtaining ethical approval is a critical step in conducting ethical research, particularly when dealing with human subjects or sensitive data. Here’s a guide to structuring your description of how ethical approval was obtained for your research:

1. Identify the Ethical Review Board:


You should begin by specifying the ethical review board or institutional review board (IRB) that reviewed your study. Mentioning the board’s name establishes credibility.

Example:
"Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of [University/Organization Name]."

2. Provide the Review Process:


Next, include details about the submission and review process. Describe how you prepared your application and what documentation was included.

Example:
"I submitted a comprehensive research proposal that outlined the study's objectives, design, methodologies, participant recruitment strategies, and data management plans. This proposal included informed consent forms and measures to protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality."

3. Mention Any Necessary Revisions:


It’s common for review boards to request revisions or clarifications. If applicable, mention any feedback you received and how you addressed it.

Example:
"Following the initial submission, the IRB provided feedback requiring additional details on participant recruitment and enhanced privacy measures. After making the necessary revisions, the proposal was re-submitted and subsequently approved."

4. Include Approval Details:


Specify the date of approval and any reference numbers. This adds transparency and allows others to verify the approval.

Example:
"The study was approved on [Date], and the approval reference number is [Reference Number]."

5. State Compliance Standards:


You may want to briefly mention that you adhered to relevant ethical guidelines, such as the Belmont Report, the Declaration of Helsinki, or specific national regulations regarding human subjects research.

Example:
"This research complies with the ethical principles outlined in the Belmont Report, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice."

Complete Example:


"Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of [University/Organization Name]. I submitted a comprehensive research proposal that outlined the study’s objectives, design, methodologies, participant recruitment strategies, and data management plans. This proposal included informed consent forms and measures to protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality. Following the initial submission, the IRB provided feedback requiring additional details on participant recruitment and enhanced privacy measures. After making the necessary revisions, the proposal was re-submitted and subsequently approved. The study was approved on [Date], with the approval reference number [Reference Number]. This research complies with the ethical principles outlined in the Belmont Report, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice."

This structured format should help you clearly communicate how ethical approval was obtained in your research.

{DateTime.UtcNow:HH:mm}
MistralMistral AI
I need to write research ethics and positionality statements. Guide me: 1) Describe how ethical approval was obtained

Certainly! Writing research ethics and positionality statements is crucial for ensuring transparency, integrity, and accountability in your research. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you describe how ethical approval was obtained:

Research Ethics Statement


  • Introduction:

  • Briefly introduce the importance of ethical considerations in your research.

  • Mention the ethical guidelines or frameworks you followed (e.g., institutional guidelines, national regulations, international standards).

  • Ethical Approval Process:

  • Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee:

  • Specify the name of the IRB or ethics committee that reviewed your research proposal.

  • Describe the submission process, including the documents submitted (e.g., research protocol, consent forms, participant information sheets).

  • Approval Date:

  • Mention the date when ethical approval was granted.

  • Approval Number:

  • Provide the approval number or reference code if applicable.

  • Informed Consent:

  • Explain how informed consent was obtained from participants.

  • Describe the consent process, including the information provided to participants and how consent was documented (e.g., written consent forms, verbal consent with audio recording).

  • Confidentiality and Data Protection:

  • Outline the measures taken to ensure the confidentiality and protection of participant data.

  • Mention any data encryption, anonymization, or secure storage methods used.

  • Risk Management:

  • Discuss any potential risks to participants and how these were mitigated.

  • Explain the procedures for handling adverse events or participant distress.

  • Ethical Considerations During Research:

  • Describe any ethical considerations that arose during the research process and how they were addressed.

  • Mention any ethical dilemmas and the decisions made to resolve them.

  • Conclusion:

  • Summarize the ethical approval process and reiterate the commitment to ethical standards throughout the research.


Example:

Research Ethics Statement

Ethical considerations are paramount in ensuring the integrity and validity of this research. The study adhered to the ethical guidelines set forth by [Institution Name] and the [National/International Ethical Guidelines].

Ethical approval was obtained from the [Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee Name] at [Institution Name]. The research proposal, including the protocol, consent forms, and participant information sheets, was submitted for review. The approval was granted on [Date], with the approval number [Approval Number].

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Each participant was provided with a detailed information sheet and a consent form. Written consent was obtained, and participants were assured of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty.

Confidentiality and data protection were ensured through the use of anonymized data and secure storage methods. All data were encrypted and stored in a secure, password-protected database.

Potential risks to participants were identified and mitigated through careful planning and risk management strategies. Procedures were in place to handle any adverse events or participant distress, ensuring the well-being of all participants.

Throughout the research process, ethical considerations were continuously monitored and addressed. Any ethical dilemmas were resolved through consultation with the ethics committee and adherence to ethical guidelines.

In conclusion, the ethical approval process was rigorous and comprehensive, ensuring that the research was conducted with the highest ethical standards.

Positionality Statement

A positionality statement reflects your personal background, biases, and how these might influence your research. Here’s a guide to writing a positionality statement:

  • Introduction:

  • Explain the importance of positionality in research.

  • Mention how your personal background and experiences might influence your research.

  • Personal Background:

  • Describe your personal background, including relevant demographic information (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status).

  • Discuss your educational and professional background.

  • Biases and Assumptions:

  • Identify any biases or assumptions you might have that could influence your research.

  • Explain how you plan to mitigate these biases.

  • Relationship with Participants:

  • Describe your relationship with the research participants.

  • Discuss any power dynamics and how you plan to address them.

  • Reflexivity:

  • Explain how you will practice reflexivity throughout the research process.

  • Describe any methods you will use to reflect on your positionality and its impact on the research.

  • Conclusion:

  • Summarize your positionality statement and reiterate your commitment to ethical and unbiased research.


Example:

Positionality Statement

Positionality is a critical aspect of research, as it acknowledges the researcher's personal background and how it might influence the research process. As a researcher, my personal background and experiences inevitably shape my perspectives and interpretations.

I am a [Your Age]-year-old [Your Gender] of [Your Ethnicity] descent, born and raised in [Your Location]. I have a [Your Educational Background] and have worked in [Your Professional Background]. These experiences have shaped my worldview and influenced my approach to research.

I recognize that I may have biases and assumptions that could affect my research. For example, [Describe a specific bias or assumption]. To mitigate these biases, I will [Describe the methods you will use to address these biases, such as peer review, reflexive journaling, or participant feedback].

My relationship with the research participants is [Describe your relationship, e.g., as an outsider, insider, or somewhere in between]. I am aware of the power dynamics that may exist and will strive to create an equitable and respectful research environment.

Throughout the research process, I will practice reflexivity by [Describe your methods for reflexivity, such as keeping a reflexive journal, discussing with peers, or seeking feedback from participants]. This will help me to continuously reflect on my positionality and its impact on the research.

In conclusion, acknowledging and addressing my positionality is essential for conducting ethical and unbiased research. I am committed to maintaining transparency and integrity throughout the research process.

By following these guidelines, you can create comprehensive and transparent research ethics and positionality statements.

{DateTime.UtcNow:HH:mm}

Analysis

This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:

Response Characteristics

ChatGPT: Provides a detailed response with 30 sentences.

Mistral: Provides a direct response with 82 sentences.

Key Takeaways

  • Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
  • Response styles vary significantly between models
  • Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models

Try This Comparison Yourself

Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.


This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: October 15, 2025 | Models: ChatGPT, Mistral