This is an exciting and crucial area of qualitative research! Examining power and oppression requires a robust theoretical foundation. Choosing the right critical framework (or combination) will deeply shape your research questions, methodology, analysis, and interpretation.

Let's break down several critical frameworks, keeping in mind your focus on power and oppression, and elaborating on feminist approaches as you hinted.

Understanding Critical Frameworks

Critical frameworks are more than just theories; they are lenses that guide your understanding of the world, what constitutes knowledge, and the purpose of research. They inherently challenge dominant narratives and seek to expose, analyze, and ultimately transform oppressive structures.

Key Commonalities of Critical Frameworks:

• Ontology: Reality is socially constructed, shaped by power relations.


• Epistemology: Knowledge is not neutral; it is produced within power structures and reflects the interests of dominant groups. Research aims to uncover these power dynamics.


• Axiology: Research is value-laden and emancipatory. It seeks to give voice to the marginalized, challenge oppression, and contribute to social justice.

---

Critical Frameworks for Examining Power and Oppression

Here are several powerful critical frameworks, with a deeper dive into feminist theories:

1. Feminist Theories (Various Strands)

Feminist theories are diverse, but all share a commitment to understanding and challenging gender-based power imbalances and oppression. They center women's experiences and perspectives, exposing how patriarchy shapes social structures, institutions, and individual lives.

Core Tenets:

• Gender is a social construct, not solely biological.


• Patriarchy (a system of male dominance) is a fundamental form of oppression.


• Gender intersects with other forms of identity (race, class, sexuality, ability) to create unique experiences of power and oppression.


• The personal is political.

Focus on Power & Oppression:

• Gendered Power: How power is distributed and exercised along gender lines.


• Patriarchy: Systemic male dominance and the institutions that uphold it.


• Sexism: Discrimination and prejudice based on sex or gender.


• Gender-based Violence: Physical, emotional, and structural violence targeting specific genders.


• Reproductive Justice: Control over one's body and reproductive decisions.


• Economic Inequality: Gender pay gaps, occupational segregation, feminization of poverty.


• Epistemic Injustice: The silencing or discrediting of women's knowledge and experiences.

Key Questions It Asks:

• How do gender norms and expectations shape individuals' experiences of power and oppression?


• In what ways do institutions (e.g., legal, medical, educational) perpetuate gender inequality?


• How do women resist and challenge patriarchal structures?


• What are the gendered impacts of specific policies or social phenomena?


• How do discourses construct gender in ways that maintain power imbalances?

Different Strands of Feminism (Consider which aligns best):

• Liberal Feminism: Focuses on achieving equality within existing social and political systems (e.g., equal pay, equal rights, representation). Less "critical" of the foundational structures, but still identifies oppression.


• Radical Feminism: Argues that patriarchy is the root cause of all oppression. Seeks fundamental societal transformation, often emphasizing women's autonomy and separation from male-dominated structures.


• Socialist/Marxist Feminism: Connects gender oppression with class exploitation under capitalism. Argues that both patriarchy and capitalism must be dismantled for women's liberation.


• Black Feminism (and other critical feminisms like Latina, Indigenous Feminisms): Crucially critiques mainstream feminism for often being white-centric and failing to adequately address race and other intersecting oppressions. Led directly to Intersectionality (see below).


• Post-structural/Queer Feminism: Challenges essentialist notions of gender and sexuality, viewing them as fluid, performative, and discursively constructed. Often informed by Foucault and Butler, it deconstructs binaries (man/woman, gay/straight).


• Ecofeminism: Connects the domination of women with the domination of nature, highlighting shared patriarchal logics.

Choosing a Feminist Framework:
Your choice here will depend on which aspects of gendered power and oppression you want to foreground, and how you understand the relationship between gender and other social categories.

---

2. Intersectionality

While often integrated into feminist or critical race theory, Intersectionality has emerged as a crucial stand-alone framework. Coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, it's essential for understanding complex forms of oppression.

Core Tenets:

• Multiple social identities (race, gender, class, sexuality, disability, nationality, etc.) intersect to create unique experiences of privilege and oppression.


• These intersections are not simply additive (e.g., being Black + being a woman is not just "double oppression") but create qualitatively distinct experiences.


• Systems of power (racism, sexism, classism, homophobia, ableism) are interlinked and mutually constitutive.

Focus on Power & Oppression:

• Examines how different systems of power converge to produce specific vulnerabilities and opportunities.


• Reveals how individuals at the margins of multiple categories experience forms of oppression that those in more privileged positions within those categories might not.


• Challenges single-axis analyses of oppression.

Key Questions It Asks:

• How do individuals' intersecting identities shape their experiences of power, privilege, and marginalization?


• How do policies or practices differentially impact people based on their multiple social locations?


• What unique forms of discrimination or resistance emerge at the junctures of various identity categories?


• How do power structures exploit or amplify intersecting oppressions?

Considerations: Intersectionality is almost a mandatory lens for any critical research aiming for nuance, especially if your participants come from diverse backgrounds.

---

3. Critical Race Theory (CRT)

CRT originated in legal studies but has expanded to various disciplines to analyze how race and racism have shaped legal systems, policies, and social structures.

Core Tenets:

• Race is a social construct, not a biological reality.


• Racism is not merely individual prejudice but is systemic and institutionalized, deeply embedded in laws, policies, and practices.


• White supremacy is the norm against which racialized groups are measured.


• Interest convergence: Racial progress often occurs when it serves the interests of dominant (white) groups.


• The lived experiences and narratives of people of color are central to understanding racism.

Focus on Power & Oppression:

• Systemic Racism: How racism is embedded in institutions and structures.


• Racial Power: The distribution of power and resources along racial lines.


• White Privilege: The unearned advantages and benefits accorded to white people.


• Microaggressions: Subtle, everyday forms of racism that often contribute to significant psychological and emotional harm.


• Racialized Policies: How laws and policies explicitly or implicitly create and maintain racial inequality.

Key Questions It Asks:

• How do racial power dynamics manifest in specific social settings or institutions?


• What role does race play in shaping access to resources, opportunities, and justice?


• How do racialized discourses perpetuate stereotypes and maintain power imbalances?


• What are the lived experiences of racialized individuals within oppressive systems?

---

4. Postcolonial & Decolonial Theories

These frameworks analyze the lasting legacies of colonialism and imperialism, both in former colonies and in the ongoing global power dynamics. Decolonial theory often goes further, calling for a dismantling of colonial knowledge systems and power structures.

Core Tenets:

• Colonialism profoundly shaped global political, economic, and cultural systems.


• Eurocentrism: Western ways of knowing, being, and governing are often presented as universal and superior.


• Subaltern voices: Giving agency and voice to those marginalized by colonial narratives.


• Neocolonialism: The continuation of colonial exploitation through economic, political, or cultural means after formal independence.


• Epistemic Violence: The destruction or devaluing of indigenous knowledge systems.

Focus on Power & Oppression:

• Colonial Power Structures: How historical and ongoing colonial relationships dictate global and local power.


• Cultural Imperialism: The imposition of dominant cultural values and norms.


• Resource Exploitation: The economic dimensions of colonial and neocolonial relationships.


• Racial and Ethnic Subjugation: How colonialism created racial hierarchies.


• Sovereignty and Self-determination: The struggle for indigenous and formerly colonized peoples to regain control.

Key Questions It Asks:

• How does the legacy of colonialism continue to shape contemporary power relations and inequalities?


• Whose knowledge is privileged, and whose is marginalized in specific contexts?


• How are discourses of development, modernity, or humanitarianism entangled with colonial power?


• How do formerly colonized communities resist and reclaim agency and knowledge?

---

5. Queer Theory

Queer theory critiques heteronormativity and essentialist notions of gender and sexuality, challenging dominant categories and binaries.

Core Tenets:

• Gender and sexuality are fluid, performative, and socially constructed, not fixed or natural.


• Heteronormativity (the assumption that heterosexuality is the default/normal sexuality) is a key organizing principle of society.


• Challenges binary thinking (man/woman, gay/straight).


• Seeks to disrupt and deconstruct established categories that regulate desire, identity, and social roles.

Focus on Power & Oppression:

• Heterosexism & Homophobia/Transphobia: Discrimination and prejudice against non-heterosexual or non-cisgender identities.


• Normativity: How social norms regarding gender and sexuality restrict expression and identity.


• Policing of Bodies: How societal expectations control and punish non-conforming bodies and desires.


• Pathologization: The medicalization or criminalization of non-normative sexualities and genders.

Key Questions It Asks:

• How do societal norms around gender and sexuality produce forms of inclusion and exclusion?


• How are non-normative sexualities and genders represented or silenced in specific contexts?


• How do individuals resist and subvert heteronormative expectations?


• What power dynamics are at play in the construction and regulation of "normal" and "deviant" bodies and desires?

---

6. Disability Studies / Crip Theory

These frameworks challenge the medical model of disability, arguing that disability is largely a social construct and a product of an inaccessible and ableist society. Crip theory takes a more radical stance, reclaiming and re-valuing disabled identities and challenging the "normate" body.

Core Tenets:

• Social Model of Disability: Disability is caused by societal barriers and attitudes, not by individual impairment.


• Ableism: Discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities.


• Normate Body: Society designs itself around an assumed "normal" or ideal body/mind, excluding those who do not fit.


• Intersectional Nature: Disability intersects with race, gender, class, etc.

Focus on Power & Oppression:

• Systemic Exclusion: How built environments, policies, and attitudes marginalize disabled people.


• Ableist Narratives: The pervasive stereotypes and negative representations of disability.


• Medicalization of Difference: The tendency to view disability as an individual flaw to be fixed, rather than a social issue.


• Access Barriers: Lack of physical, informational, and social access.

Key Questions It Asks:

• How do ableist assumptions shape policies, technologies, or social interactions?


• What are the lived experiences of people with disabilities navigating an ableist world?


• How are disabled bodies and minds represented in culture, and what power dynamics do these representations reflect?


• How do disabled communities challenge ableism and reclaim agency?

---

7. Post-Structuralism (e.g., Foucauldian Analysis)

While not a unified "theory" in the same way as feminism, a post-structuralist lens (particularly influenced by Foucault) is highly critical and potent for analyzing power and oppression.

Core Tenets:

• Power is Productive, not just Repressive: Power doesn't just forbid; it also produces subjects, discourses, and forms of knowledge.


• Power/Knowledge Nexus: Power and knowledge are inseparable. What we "know" is always embedded in power relations, and knowledge is used to exert power.


• Discourse: Systems of language, practices, and institutions that shape our understanding of reality and constitute subjects.


• Surveillance & Normalization: Power operates through subtle forms of observation, classification, and the establishment of norms, leading to self-regulation.

Focus on Power & Oppression:

• Examines how "truths" are constructed and maintained through discourse and institutions.


• Analyzes how specific subjectivities (e.g., "the criminal," "the mad," "the patient," "the good citizen") are created and governed.


• Reveals the micro-physics of power operating in everyday interactions and seemingly neutral spaces.


• Challenges universal claims to truth and rationality, showing their historical and power-laden origins.

Key Questions It Asks:

• How is power exercised through specific discourses (e.g., medical discourse, legal discourse, media discourse)?


• How do institutions (schools, prisons, hospitals) shape and discipline individuals' bodies and minds?


• What forms of knowledge are privileged, and which are marginalized, and for what purposes?


• How are "normal" and "deviant" categories constructed and used to regulate behavior?

---

How to Choose Your Framework(s):

• Start with Your Research Question(s): This is the single most important factor.


• Are you primarily concerned with gendered experiences? (Feminist, Intersectionality)


• Is race central to the oppression you observe? (CRT, Intersectionality)


• Are you looking at the lingering effects of colonialism? (Postcolonial/Decolonial)


• Are you challenging binary understandings of identity? (Queer, Post-structural)


• Are you interested in how societal structures disable people? (Disability Studies/Crip Theory)


• Are you focused on how power operates through knowledge, discourse, and institutions? (Foucauldian/Post-structural)


• Consider Your Phenomenon of Interest: What are you studying? (e.g., a specific policy, a community's lived experience, media representations, an organizational culture). Certain frameworks lend themselves better to specific types of analysis.


• Align with Your Ontological and Epistemological Stance: As mentioned, critical frameworks assume a constructed, power-laden reality and emancipatory knowledge. Ensure your own worldview aligns.


• Review the Literature: What frameworks are already being used in your specific area of inquiry? What gaps exist? Can you bring a novel framework to a familiar problem?


• Your Positionality: As the researcher, your own social location (race, gender, class, etc.) can inform and influence your choice of framework. Be transparent about this.


• Combinations Are Powerful: Many critical researchers effectively combine frameworks. For example:


• Intersectional Feminism: Analyzing how gender, race, class, and other identities intersect in women's experiences.


• Queer Critical Race Theory: Examining the racialization of queer identities or the queer dimensions of racial oppression.


• Postcolonial Disability Studies: Exploring how colonial histories shape experiences of disability in the Global South.


• Foucauldian Feminist Analysis: Investigating how gendered discourses and power operate within institutions to regulate women's bodies and behaviors.

Practical Steps:

• Read deeply: Once you have a few potential frameworks, dive into core texts from those traditions.


• Draft "Framework Statements": For each potential framework, write a short paragraph explaining how it would illuminate your research question and phenomenon. This helps clarify your thinking.


• Pilot your ideas: If possible, try applying aspects of your chosen framework to some preliminary data or observations to see how it shapes your analysis.

By carefully considering these points, you'll be well-equipped to select a critical framework that provides the theoretical rigor and analytical depth your qualitative research on power and oppression demands. Good luck!