I'm writing statistical analysis plan for grant. Guide me: 1) Describe statistical approach for each aim
Creating a statistical analysis plan (SAP) for a grant proposal involves clearly outlining how you plan to analyze the data to answer your research questions or hypotheses related to each aim of your study. Here’s a guide on how to structure the statistical approach for each aim:
General Structure:
For each aim, include the following sections:
- Aim Overview: Briefly describe the aim and its associated hypotheses.
- Study Design: Provide context regarding the study design (e.g., randomized controlled trial, cohort study, cross-sectional study, etc.).
- Statistical Methods: Detail the specific statistical techniques you will use for analysis.
- Outcome Measures: Explain how the primary and secondary outcomes will be defined and measured.
- Sample Size Considerations: Mention how sample size has been calculated, if applicable.
- Handling of Missing Data: Describe how you will address missing data in your analyses.
Example Format for Each Aim:
Aim 1: [Describe the Aim]
- Aim Overview: State what you aim to evaluate or determine.
- Study Design: Briefly describe the study design adopted for this aim.
- Statistical Methods:
- For continuous outcomes, specify whether you will use t-tests, ANOVA, or regression models.
- For categorical outcomes, specify whether you will use chi-square tests, logistic regression, etc.
- State any adjustments for covariates, and specify if you will use multivariable regression techniques.
- Outcome Measures: Describe the primary and secondary outcomes related to the aim. Specify measurement tools, scales, or indices used.
- Sample Size Considerations: Briefly outline how many participants will be needed to adequately power the analysis. This should be based on expected effect sizes, alpha levels, and power calculations.
- Handling of Missing Data: Specify your method for dealing with missing data (e.g., multiple imputation, complete case analysis).
Aim 2: [Describe the Aim]
- Aim Overview: [...]
- Study Design: [...]
- Statistical Methods:
- Indicate if you’re examining relationships (correlations) or differences between groups.
- If longitudinal data is involved, you might use mixed-effects models or generalized estimating equations.
- If you have repeated measures, specify how you will account for those in your analysis.
- Outcome Measures: [...]
- Sample Size Considerations: [...]
- Handling of Missing Data: [...]
Aim 3: [Describe the Aim]
- Aim Overview: [...]
- Study Design: [...]
- Statistical Methods:
- Discuss specific methodologies that are relevant to any advanced analyses (e.g., survival analysis with Cox proportional hazards models if applicable).
- If you will conduct subgroup analyses, specify the method and the criteria for defining subgroups.
- Describe any planned sensitivity analyses.
- Outcome Measures: [...]
- Sample Size Considerations: [...]
- Handling of Missing Data: [...]
Additional Considerations:
- Significance Levels: Clearly state the alpha level you will use (commonly α = 0.05).
- Adjustments for Multiple Comparisons: If applicable, state how you will adjust for multiple comparisons (e.g., Bonferroni correction).
- Software: Indicate which statistical software will be used for the analyses (e.g., R, SAS, SPSS).
Final Notes:
- Align your statistical methods with the study objectives and hypotheses.
- Make sure your statistical plan is feasible given the study design and budget.
- Be clear and concise, yet thoroughly detailed, to ensure that reviewers understand the rigor of your approach.
Tailor each section based on the specifics of your study, including the objectives, expected outcomes, and analysis requirements. Lastly, ensure collaborators or co-investigators review the plan for completeness and clarity.
Guide to Describing Statistical Approaches for Each Aim
General Structure for Each Aim
For each aim in your grant, include:
1. Aim Statement (Brief Recap)
- Restate the specific aim concisely
- Clarify the hypothesis being tested
2. Study Design & Data Structure
- Sample size and grouping
- Type of data (cross-sectional, longitudinal, clustered, etc.)
- Outcome variables (continuous, binary, count, time-to-event)
- Predictor/independent variables
3. Primary Statistical Method
- Name the specific test/model (e.g., linear regression, Cox proportional hazards, mixed effects models)
- Justify why this method is appropriate for your data structure and research question
4. Key Variables
- Dependent variable(s): What you're measuring
- Independent variable(s): What you're manipulating or comparing
- Covariates/Confounders: What you'll adjust for
5. Analytic Details
Model specification:
- Functional form of the model
- Link functions (for GLMs)
- Random effects structure (for mixed models)
- Interaction terms being tested
Assumptions:
- State what assumptions the method requires
- How you'll check them (diagnostics)
- Alternative approaches if assumptions violated
Adjustment strategy:
- Which covariates you'll include and why
- Approach to model building (a priori selection vs. stepwise, etc.)
6. Effect Size & Interpretation
- What parameter estimates you'll report (odds ratios, hazard ratios, mean differences, etc.)
- How you'll quantify clinical/practical significance
7. Sensitivity Analyses
- Alternative models or subgroup analyses
- How you'll handle missing data
- Robustness checks
8. Multiple Comparisons
- If relevant, how you'll adjust for multiple testing
- Alpha level and power considerations
Example Template
Aim 1: To determine whether [intervention X] reduces [outcome Y] compared to [control]
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial with N=[#] participants per arm, measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Outcome Variable: [Outcome Y] measured as [continuous/binary/etc.]
Primary Analysis: We will use linear mixed effects models (LMM) to assess the effect of treatment on outcome Y over time. This approach accounts for within-subject correlation from repeated measures and accommodates missing data under the missing at random (MAR) assumption.
Model Specification:
- Fixed effects: treatment group, time, treatment × time interaction
- Random effects: random intercept and slope for time (subject-specific trajectories)
- Covariates: baseline [age, sex, disease severity]
The treatment effect will be assessed by the treatment × time interaction term, with post-hoc contrasts at each time point.
Assumptions: We will assess normality of residuals using Q-Q plots and homoscedasticity using residual plots. If violations occur, we will consider transformations or generalized estimating equations (GEE) as an alternative.
Missing Data: LMM uses all available data under MAR. We will perform sensitivity analyses using pattern mixture models to assess impact of data not missing at random (NMAR).
Effect Sizes: We will report adjusted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals and calculate Cohen's d for standardized effect sizes.
Multiple Comparisons: We will use Bonferroni correction for post-hoc pairwise comparisons across time points.
Common Statistical Approaches by Aim Type
| Research Question Type | Common Statistical Approach |
|---|---|
| Compare 2+ groups (continuous outcome) | t-test, ANOVA, linear regression |
| Compare 2+ groups (binary outcome) | Chi-square, logistic regression |
| Compare 2+ groups over time | Mixed effects models, GEE, repeated measures ANOVA |
| Predict an outcome | Multiple regression, machine learning approaches |
| Time-to-event | Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards regression |
| Mediation/moderation | Structural equation modeling, Hayes PROCESS |
| Association between variables | Correlation, simple/multiple regression |
| Clustered data |
💡 Try this comparison yourself:Compare AI models side-by-side on SNEOS
Analysis
This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:
Response Characteristics
ChatGPT: Provides a concise response with 79 sentences.
Claude: Provides a detailed response with 25 sentences.
Key Takeaways
- Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
- Response styles vary significantly between models
- Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models
Try This Comparison Yourself
Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.
This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: October 15, 2025 | Models: ChatGPT, Claude