I'm writing biographical sketch (biosketch) for NIH. Help me: 1) Follow NIH biosketch format precisely
Creating an NIH Biosketch requires meticulous attention to detail to ensure it meets the precise formatting and content requirements. A well-crafted biosketch is crucial for conveying your qualifications and the relevance of your work to your proposed research.
Here's a detailed guide to help you follow the NIH biosketch format precisely, focusing on the most common format (general research grants, e.g., R01, R21, U01). Be aware that specific grant types (e.g., Fellowships, Career Development Awards [K-series]) might have slight variations, particularly in Section D or additional sections like E or F. Always refer to the specific FOA (Funding Opportunity Announcement) and the latest NIH Biosketch instructions for the most accurate and up-to-date information.
NIH Biographical Sketch (Biosketch) Format Guide
Current Version: The NIH biosketch format was updated in 2021, and the current version (referred to as "FORMS-H" for submissions starting January 25, 2023) is what you should be using. This guide reflects that format.
General Formatting Rules (Mandatory!)
- Page Limit: 5 pages maximum. This is strictly enforced.
- Font:
- Arial, Helvetica, Palatino Linotype, or Georgia typeface.
- A black font color must be used.
- Recommended Size: 11 points or larger. (A symbol font may be used to insert Greek letters or special characters; the symbol font face chosen must be 11 points or larger.)
- Margins:
- At least one-half inch (0.5 inch or 1.27 cm) on all four sides.
- Header:
- Your Name: Must appear at the top of every page.
- ORCID ID: Include your ORCID ID in the header (if you have one). Example: "Name: John Doe | ORCID ID: 0000-0001-2345-6789"
- Section Headings: Use the exact headings (A, B, C, D) as specified by NIH.
- File Format: Must be submitted as a PDF.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Name: [Your Full Name] | ORCID ID: [Your ORCID ID, if available]
e.g., Name: Jane A. Smith | ORCID ID: 0000-0001-2345-6789
A. Personal Statement
- Purpose: To briefly describe why your experience and qualifications make you particularly well-suited for your role in the project. It should highlight your most significant research achievements and their relevance to the proposed research.
- Content Guidelines:
- Focus on Relevance: Explain how your scientific expertise, training, and experience align with the specific aims of the grant proposal.
- Career Goals (Optional but Recommended): Briefly mention your career goals, especially if they are furthered by the proposed research.
- Key Accomplishments: Summarize your most significant accomplishments, especially those relevant to the project.
- Max 4 Citations: You may cite up to four publications or research products (e.g., datasets, software, patents) that are most relevant to the project and exemplify your qualifications. These do not count towards the page limit for the entire biosketch if you link to a bibliography (see ORCID below).
- Specific Role: Clearly state your specific role in the proposed project (e.g., "As PI of this proposal," "As a Co-Investigator responsible for Aim 2").
- Key Tips:
- Tailor it! This section MUST be customized for each grant application. Don't use a generic statement.
- Concise and Engaging: Get straight to the point. This is your "elevator pitch."
- Strong Opening: Start with a strong statement linking your expertise to the project.
- Avoid Redundancy: Don't repeat full details from C. Contributions to Science.
- Example Structure:
B. Positions, Scientific Appointments, and Honors
- Purpose: To provide a chronological record of your academic and professional career, demonstrating your progression and recognition.
- Content Guidelines:
- Education: List degrees (e.g., B.S., M.S., Ph.D., M.D.), institutions, and dates.
- Positions: List all academic, scientific, or professional positions, in reverse chronological order (most recent first). Include start and end dates.
- Honors and Awards: List significant awards, recognitions, elected memberships in professional societies, and scholarships. You can include major grants or fellowships if they are honors (e.g., NIH Pathway to Independence Award, HHMI Investigator).
- Key Tips:
- Clarity: Use clear, official titles for positions.
- Completeness: Include all relevant positions, even if short-term.
- Distinction: Make sure awards listed here are distinct from specific research grants (which might be in Section D for some biosketch types, but generally not the main focus here).
- Example Structure:
- Education
- 2010 Ph.D., Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA
- 2005 B.S., Biochemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
- Positions, Scientific Appointments, and Honors
- 2020-Present: Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of X, City, State
- 2015-2020: Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of X, City, State
- 2012-2015: Postdoctoral Fellow, Lab of Dr. B, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA
- 2010-2012: Postdoctoral Scholar, Lab of Dr. A, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Honors:
- 2021: Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
- 2018: NIH K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Award
- 2011: Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (F32)
C. Contributions to Science
- Purpose: To describe your most significant contributions to science, providing context, specific findings, and their impact.
- Content Guidelines:
- Max 5 Contributions: You are limited to five distinct contributions. If you have more, choose the five most impactful and relevant to your scientific career and the current proposal.
- Narrative for Each: For each contribution, provide a concise narrative (a paragraph, typically 4-8 sentences) that:
- Describes the historical background that frames the scientific problem.
- States your specific contribution(s) to addressing the problem.
- Summarizes the key findings and their significance.
- Explains the influence of your findings on the field or how they have changed scientific paradigms.
- Up to 4 Citations Per Contribution: For each contribution, cite up to four of your most relevant peer-reviewed publications or research products (e.g., datasets, software, patents, preprints).
- ORCID Link (Required): At the end of this section, provide a link to your complete list of published work as found in a publicly available digital database (e.g., MyBibliography, ORCID profile, Google Scholar). This link is mandatory.
- Key Tips:
- Tell a Story: Each contribution should tell a mini-story about a problem, your role in solving it, and the impact of that solution.
- Focus on Impact: Don't just list papers; explain why your work matters.
- Active Voice: Use active verbs to describe your actions and findings.
- Group Related Work: If you have multiple papers on a very similar topic, group them under one contribution.
- Tailor: Emphasize contributions that are most relevant to the proposed research.
- Example Structure:
"Prior to my work, the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) were difficult to visualize non-invasively, hindering understanding of disease progression. My research team developed a novel PET imaging tracer that allowed for the detection of amyloid plaques and tau tangles in vivo decades before clinical symptoms. This breakthrough provided critical insights into the sequence of pathological events in AD, demonstrating that tauopathy often precedes amyloid aggregation in specific brain regions. Our findings have significantly impacted the design of clinical trials for early AD intervention and laid the groundwork for precision diagnostics.
- Smith, J. A., et al. (2018). Nature Medicine, 24(7), 1001-1009.
- Smith, J. A., et al. (2020). Annals of Neurology, 87(3), 450-462."
Contribution 2: Development of CRISPR-based Gene Editing Tools for Therapeutic Applications.
... (continue with narrative and up to 4 citations) ...
Link to MyBibliography (or ORCID):
"See full list of my published work: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/jane.smith.1/bibliography/public/ OR https://orcid.org/0000-0001-2345-6789/"
D. Scholastic Honors and Professional Memberships / Synergistic Activities
- Purpose: This section showcases either your academic achievements (for early career researchers) or your broader impact and service to the scientific community (for more established researchers).
- Content Guidelines:
- Choose ONE heading: You will typically use either "Scholastic Honors and Professional Memberships" OR "Synergistic Activities" based on your career stage and the specific FOA requirements.
- Scholastic Honors and Professional Memberships:
- Primarily for early career researchers (e.g., graduate students, postdocs, junior faculty on K awards).
- List academic honors, scholarships, Dean's List, honor society memberships (e.g., Phi Beta Kappa), and memberships in relevant professional organizations.
- Synergistic Activities:
- Primarily for established investigators (e.g., PI on R-level grants, senior faculty).
- List up to five examples that demonstrate your broader impact and contributions to the scientific community and beyond. Examples include:
- Mentorship activities (e.g., specific students/postdocs mentored to faculty positions).
- Peer review service (e.g., NIH study section membership, journal editorial board).
- Development of research resources (e.g., unique animal models, software, databases shared with the scientific community).
- Major invited lectures or presentations.
- Leadership roles in scientific organizations or committees.
- Public outreach or policy advisory roles related to your science.
- Key Tips:
- Be Strategic: Choose the section that best highlights your strengths for the specific application.
- Quantify if Possible: For synergistic activities, give specific examples (e.g., "Mentored 3 postdocs who are now independent faculty").
- Avoid Redundancy: Don't repeat honors already listed in Section B.
- Example Structure (Scholastic Honors):
- D. Scholastic Honors and Professional Memberships
- 2005: Magna Cum Laude, MIT
- 2005: Phi Beta Kappa Honor Society
- 2010: Outstanding Graduate Student Award, UC Berkeley
- 2015-Present: Member, American Society for Cell Biology
- 2018-Present: Member, Society for Neuroscience
- Example Structure (Synergistic Activities):
- D. Synergistic Activities
- 1. Mentorship: Served as primary mentor for 5 Ph.D. students and 3 postdoctoral fellows, all of whom have successfully transitioned to independent research careers.
- 2. Peer Review: Member of NIH study section [Study Section Name] (2018-2022); Editorial Board, Journal of X (2019-Present).
- 3. Resource Development: Developed and disseminated open-source software, "BioAnalyzer 2.0," which has been downloaded over 5,000 times globally for high-throughput data analysis.
- 4. Public Outreach: Invited speaker at multiple community science events and high school programs, promoting STEM education.
- 5. Scientific Leadership: Co-chair of the [Society Name] Annual Meeting Program Committee (2020, 2022).
Important Considerations & Best Practices:
- Start Early: Compiling a comprehensive and tailored biosketch takes time.
- Review NIH Instructions: Always download and review the latest official NIH Biosketch instructions for the specific application (found in the FOA and on the NIH website under "How to Apply - Application Guide"). Instructions can change.
- Tailor, Tailor, Tailor: Every section, especially A and C, should be specifically tailored to the grant you are applying for. Highlight experience and publications most relevant to the proposed research.
- Proofread Meticulously: Typos and grammatical errors undermine your professionalism. Have multiple people proofread it.
- Ask for Feedback: Share your biosketch with your mentor, PI, or colleagues for constructive criticism.
- Maintain a Master Version: Keep a comprehensive master biosketch that you can draw from for various applications, then customize as needed.
- ORCID is Key: Ensure your ORCID profile is up-to-date and comprehensive, as it's directly linked from your biosketch. MyBibliography is also highly recommended.
- Be Specific: Instead of "I have strong experience in X," say "My research in X led to Y and Z."
By following these guidelines precisely, you will create an NIH Biosketch that is not only compliant but also effectively showcases your qualifications and scientific contributions. Good luck!
Below, I'll help you craft a biographical sketch (biosketch) for the NIH by explaining the precise format required by the National Institutes of Health (as of the current guidelines, effective January 25, 2020, via NOT-OD-20-050, with updates in NOT-OD-23-204 for biosketch-related instructions). NIH biosketches are used for grant applications (e.g., R01, K awards) and must follow a strict, non-negotiable structure to avoid rejection. You cannot exceed page limits, and formatting must adhere to SF 424 (R&R) guidelines (e.g., Arial 11-point font, 0.5-inch margins, no hyperlinks).
I'll outline the format step by step, provide a template with placeholders, and offer tips based on NIH's official instructions (found on the NIH website under "Biosketch Format Pages"). Important: This is a general template—customize it with your real information. Do not fabricate data, as NIH verifies accuracy. If you're submitting, use the FORMS-H package in ASSIST or similar tools for validation.
Key NIH Biosketch Rules
- Length: Up to 5 pages total (including sections A–E).
- Order: Follow sections A–E exactly. Do not add extra sections or deviate.
- Personal Statement: Limited to 4,000 characters (including spaces).
- Positions and Honors: List in reverse chronological order (newest first). No more than 15 positions/honors.
- Contributions to Science: Up to 5 contributions, each ≤1 page (total ≤5 pages). Focus on your most significant work; use past tense for completed work.
- Research Support: List ongoing/pending projects (active first, then completed within 3 years). Limit to relevant support; no page limit but keep concise.
- General Tips:
- Use clear, professional language. Avoid jargon unless defined.
- Emphasize impact (e.g., citations, collaborations, societal benefits).
- For collaborators: If this is for a team, ensure consistency across biosketches.
- Common Errors to Avoid: Omitting eRA Commons ID, using hyperlinks, or exceeding character limits. NIH rejects non-compliant biosketches.
- Resources: Download the official template from grants.nih.gov/grants/forms/biosketch-blank.pdf. Review examples in NOT-OD-19-114.
NIH Biosketch Template
Copy this into a word processor and fill in your details. I've bolded section headers for clarity.
A. Personal Statement
Briefly describe why your experience and qualifications make you particularly well-suited for your role (e.g., PD/PI, collaborator, consultant) in the proposed study.
Examples:
- Training and experience in a relevant field.
- Past performance as reflected in cycle dates, publications, and grants.
- Any special attributes (e.g., unique perspectives, interdisciplinary skills).
(Attach a narrative limited to 4,000 characters. Your statement here: [Insert your personal statement. Example: "With over 15 years in molecular biology and a track record of leading NIH-funded projects on cancer genomics, I am well-positioned to direct this study on targeted therapies. My interdisciplinary background in bioinformatics and clinical translation has resulted in 50+ publications and patents, enabling innovative approaches to precision medicine."])
B. Positions, Scientific Appointments, and Honors
List in chronological order (newest first) important positions and honors, including postdoctoral, residency, and clinical fellowship training. Include titles, institution, and dates (MM/YYYY–MM/YYYY or ongoing). Limit to 15 entries.
Examples:
- 2023–Present: Professor, Department of Biology, University of Example (City, State).
- 2018–2023: Associate Professor, Department of Genetics, Example Medical School (City, State).
- 2015–2018: Postdoctoral Fellow, National Cancer Institute, NIH (Bethesda, MD).
- 2014: Outstanding Young Investigator Award, American Society for Biochemistry.
(Your list here: [Insert entries. Start with most recent. If none, state "Not applicable."])
C. Contribution to Science
Briefly describe up to 5 of your most significant contributions to science. For each, list full references (in a bulleted list); do not include hyperlinks. Describe the contribution's nature, your role, and its impact. Each contribution ≤1 page total.
For each of the 5 contributions:
- State the overall question or problem addressed.
- Explain your role and how it advanced the field.
- Highlight outcomes (e.g., publications, citations, applications).
- List ≤4 key publications/products (journal articles, patents, etc.; use PubMed IDs if available).
(Do not include grant numbers here—save for Section D.)
Contribution 1: [Title: e.g., "Development of Novel CRISPR Editing Tools for Gene Therapy."
Description: [2–3 paragraphs on the work, your role, and impact. Example: "My lab pioneered a multiplex CRISPR system to edit multiple genes simultaneously, addressing limitations in single-gene therapies for genetic disorders. As principal investigator, I designed the vectors and led validation in animal models, resulting in a 40% improvement in editing efficiency... This work has been cited 500+ times and licensed to biotech firms."]
- Reference 1: Author et al. Title. Journal. Year;Volume:pages. PMID: XXXXXX.
- Reference 2: [Etc., up to 4.]]
Contribution 2: [Repeat structure.]
Contribution 3: [Repeat.]
Contribution 4: [Repeat.]
Contribution 5: [If applicable; otherwise, omit.]
If you need more space for a contribution, provide it in full here. (Your contributions here: [Fill in up to 5. Focus on peer-reviewed impact.])
D. Research Support and/or Scholastic Performance (Note: Remove "and/or Scholastic Performance" unless applying as a trainee/student; for most PIs, use "Research Support.")
List ongoing or completed research projects (including federal/non-federal support) in the last 3 years that are relevant to the proposed project. First, active/pending; then completed. For each: Title, role (e.g., PI, Co-I), funding source, dates, annual costs, overlap with proposed work, and brief summary (2–3 sentences).
Limit to relevant projects; if none, state "None."
Examples:
Ongoing/Pending:
- Title: "Genomic Profiling of Rare Diseases."
Funding: NIH/NIGMS R01.
Dates: 01/2023–12/2027.
Annual Direct Costs: $325,000.
Overlap: [Describe any with proposed project.]
Summary: [Brief abstract of project.]
Completed (within last 3 years):
- Title: [Similar structure.]
(Your list here: [Insert. Be honest about overlap to avoid rejection.])
Additional Guidance
- Filling It Out: Tailor Section A to your specific grant (e.g., highlight expertise matching the RFA/PA). In Section C, quantify impact (e.g., "This method has been adopted by 20 labs worldwide"). Use DOIs/PMIDs for easy verification.
- Common Pitfalls: Don't list all publications in C (only 4 per contribution); save full bibliographies for other sections if needed. If you're a new investigator, emphasize training/potential.
- For Specific Scenarios: If this is for a training grant (e.g., F31), add scholastic performance in D. For non-PIs (e.g., consultants), shorten to 1–2 pages focusing on relevant expertise.
- Next Steps: Review your draft against NIH's sample biosketches (search "NIH biosketch examples" on grants.nih.gov). If you share more details about your background (e.g., field, key achievements), I can help refine specific sections without fabricating info.
- Validation: Once complete, upload to NIH's ASSIST system to check formatting.
If this doesn't address your exact needs or you have a specific section to expand, provide more details!
Certainly! The NIH biosketch format is quite specific, and it's important to follow it precisely. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you create a compliant NIH biosketch:
NIH Biosketch Format
1. Personal Statement
- Limit: 700 characters (including spaces)
- Content: Briefly describe why you are well-suited for the role you will play in the proposed project.
2. Positions and Honors
- Limit: 15 lines
- Content: List your positions, honors, and awards in reverse chronological order.
3. Contributions to Science
- Limit: 5 contributions
- Content: For each contribution, provide:
- A brief description (300 characters, including spaces)
- Up to 4 peer-reviewed publications, manuscripts accepted for publication, or book chapters that are relevant to the contribution
- A brief explanation of the significance of the contribution (2500 characters, including spaces)
4. Research Support
- Limit: 15 lines
- Content: List ongoing and completed research projects for the past three years. Include:
- Project title
- Sponsor
- Identifying number
- Dates of the project
- Role on the project
5. Scholastic Performance
- Limit: 15 lines
- Content: List your educational background, including:
- Undergraduate institution(s)
- Graduate institution(s)
- Degrees earned
- Dates of attendance
Example Biosketch
1. Personal Statement
Dr. Jane Doe is a renowned expert in the field of molecular biology, with over 15 years of experience in research and teaching. Her expertise in genetic engineering and biotechnology makes her an ideal candidate for leading this project.
2. Positions and Honors
- 2023-Present: Professor, Department of Molecular Biology, University of XYZ
- 2018-2023: Associate Professor, Department of Molecular Biology, University of XYZ
- 2015-2018: Assistant Professor, Department of Molecular Biology, University of XYZ
- 2014: Recipient, Young Investigator Award, Society for Molecular Biology
- 2012: Postdoctoral Fellow, National Institute of Health
3. Contributions to Science
- Contribution: Development of a novel genetic editing tool
- Publications:
- Doe, J., Smith, A., "A Novel Genetic Editing Tool," Journal of Molecular Biology, 2020.
- Doe, J., Brown, B., "Applications of Genetic Editing in Medicine," Biotechnology Journal, 2019.
- Significance: This tool has revolutionized the field of genetic engineering, allowing for more precise and efficient gene editing. It has been widely adopted in research and clinical settings.
- Contribution: Discovery of a new biomarker for early cancer detection
- Publications:
- Doe, J., Johnson, C., "Early Detection of Cancer Using a Novel Biomarker," Cancer Research, 2018.
- Doe, J., Lee, D., "Biomarker-Based Cancer Screening," Journal of Oncology, 2017.
- Significance: This biomarker has significantly improved early cancer detection rates, leading to better patient outcomes.
- Contribution: Advancements in biotechnology for sustainable agriculture
- Publications:
- Doe, J., Green, E., "Sustainable Agriculture Through Biotechnology," Agricultural Science, 2016.
- Doe, J., White, F., "Biotechnological Solutions for Crop Yield," Journal of Agriculture, 2015.
- Significance: These advancements have led to increased crop yields and reduced environmental impact, contributing to sustainable agriculture practices.
- Contribution: Innovations in genetic therapy for rare diseases
- Publications:
- Doe, J., Black, G., "Genetic Therapy for Rare Diseases," Genetic Medicine, 2014.
- Doe, J., Gray, H., "Efficacy of Genetic Therapy in Clinical Trials," Clinical Genetics, 2013.
- Significance: These innovations have provided new treatment options for patients with rare genetic diseases, improving their quality of life.
- Contribution: Development of a new diagnostic tool for infectious diseases
- Publications:
- Doe, J., Blue, I., "A New Diagnostic Tool for Infectious Diseases," Infectious Disease Journal, 2012.
- Doe, J., Red, J., "Rapid Detection of Infectious Agents," Diagnostic Medicine, 2011.
- Significance: This diagnostic tool has enhanced the speed and accuracy of infectious disease detection, aiding in timely treatment and prevention.
4. Research Support
- 2023-Present: Principal Investigator, "Genetic Editing for Cancer Treatment," National Institute of Health, Grant #12345, 2023-2028
- 2020-2023: Co-Investigator, "Biomarker Research for Early Cancer Detection," National Cancer Institute, Grant #67890, 2020-2023
- 2018-2021: Principal Investigator, "Sustainable Agriculture Through Biotechnology," USDA, Grant #23456, 2018-2021
- 2016-2019: Co-Investigator, "Genetic Therapy for Rare Diseases," National Institute of Genetics, Grant #78901, 2016-2019
- 2014-2017: Principal Investigator, "Diagnostic Tools for Infectious Diseases," CDC, Grant #34567, 2014-2017
5. Scholastic Performance
- 2008-2012: Ph.D. in Molecular Biology, University of ABC
- 2004-2008: B.S. in Biology, University of DEF
Tips for Success
- Be Concise: Stick to the character and line limits.
- Be Specific: Highlight your most significant contributions and their impact.
- Be Relevant: Tailor your biosketch to the specific project or grant you are applying for.
By following this format, you'll ensure that your NIH biosketch is compliant and effectively showcases your qualifications and contributions.
💡 Try this comparison yourself:Compare AI models side-by-side on SNEOS
Analysis
This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:
Response Characteristics
Gemini: Provides a direct response with 209 sentences.
Grok: Provides a direct response with 142 sentences.
Mistral: Provides a direct response with 67 sentences.
Key Takeaways
- Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
- Response styles vary significantly between models
- Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models
Try This Comparison Yourself
Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.
This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: October 15, 2025 | Models: Gemini, Grok, Mistral