This is an excellent question, as the choice between a narrative and a systematic review profoundly impacts the scope, methodology, and time commitment of your literature review chapter. For a dissertation, understanding these differences is crucial for aligning with your research goals and departmental expectations.

Let's break down the differences, focusing on their implications for a dissertation.

---

1. Understanding the Difference: Traditional Narrative vs. Systematic Literature Review

Here's a side-by-side comparison:

Feature	Traditional Narrative Literature Review	Systematic Literature Review
Primary Goal	To provide a broad overview, synthesize existing knowledge, contextualize research, identify themes, and build a theoretical framework.	To answer a very specific research question, identify all relevant evidence, synthesize findings transparently, and minimize bias.
Scope & Focus	Broad, thematic, historical, theoretical. Can cover a wide range of topics and perspectives.	Narrow, focused. Defined by a specific, well-articulated research question (often using PICO/PICOS framework).
Methodology	Flexible and iterative. Author-driven selection of articles based on expertise, relevance to the topic, and interpretative judgment. No explicit, predefined protocol.	Rigorous, explicit, and predefined. Involves a detailed protocol outlining search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction, and quality assessment. Often involves two independent reviewers.
Search Strategy	Informal, unsystematic. May involve database searches, citation tracking, known seminal works. Not explicitly documented.	Comprehensive, systematic, and transparent. Detailed documentation of databases searched, keywords used, Boolean operators, and date ranges. Aims for exhaustive coverage.
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria	Implicit or loosely defined. Author decides what's relevant based on the evolving argument.	Explicitly defined a priori. All studies meeting the criteria are included; all studies not meeting them are excluded. Applied consistently.
Data Extraction	Varies; author notes key points relevant to their synthesis.	Structured. A standardized form is used to extract specific data points from each included study (e.g., methods, participants, key findings, limitations).
Quality Assessment	Informal; author critically appraises studies as part of their synthesis.	Formal. Uses predefined tools or checklists to systematically assess the methodological quality or risk of bias in each included study.
Synthesis	Qualitative, interpretative, thematic. Author weaves a "story" or argument, highlighting key theories, debates, and gaps.	Can be qualitative (narrative synthesis) or quantitative (meta-analysis). Follows a clear structure derived from the data.
Transparency & Replicability	Low. Difficult for another researcher to reproduce the exact review process and arrive at the same selection of articles or synthesis.	High. All steps are explicitly documented, making the process transparent and, in theory, replicable by other researchers. Often includes a PRISMA flow diagram.
Bias	Higher risk of author bias (e.g., cherry-picking studies that support a particular viewpoint, confirmation bias).	Lower risk of bias due to systematic and transparent methods designed to minimize researcher subjectivity.
Output	An argumentative essay, critical synthesis, or theory-building chapter.	A structured report detailing the methods, results (tables, summary statistics), and discussion of findings. May involve a meta-analysis if appropriate.
Time Commitment	Generally less time-intensive in the initial search and selection phase, but can still be lengthy for comprehensive synthesis.	Significantly more time-intensive and labor-intensive due to the rigorous protocol, extensive searching, screening, data extraction, and quality assessment.

---

For Dissertation Purposes: Which One Should You Choose?

The choice depends heavily on your discipline, research question, the existing literature, your supervisor's expectations, and your available time.

When to use a Traditional Narrative Literature Review for your Dissertation:

• Discipline: Common in humanities, arts, some social sciences (e.g., sociology, political science, education, some business fields), and qualitative research paradigms where theoretical development and nuanced interpretation are paramount.


• Research Question: When your dissertation aims to explore a broad topic, build a theoretical framework, trace the historical development of an idea, critique existing paradigms, or provide context for an entirely novel area.


• Nature of Literature: When the literature is highly diverse, theoretical, qualitative, or when there isn't a large body of empirical studies addressing a very specific question.


• Dissertation Structure: Often serves as the foundational chapter of the entire dissertation. It sets the stage, justifies your research, and positions your study within the broader academic conversation.


• Time & Resources: If your dissertation involves a substantial primary research component (e.g., extensive fieldwork, data collection, and analysis), a systematic review might be too demanding on top of that.

Example Use: If your dissertation is exploring the evolution of gender roles in 20th-century American advertising, a narrative review would be ideal to trace historical trends, analyze theoretical perspectives, and identify key cultural shifts.

When to use a Systematic Literature Review for your Dissertation:

• Discipline: Very common in health sciences, evidence-based social sciences (e.g., psychology, public health, nursing, some management fields), and any field where the aim is to synthesize empirical evidence to answer a clear policy or practice-relevant question.


• Research Question: When your dissertation seeks to answer a specific, empirical question for which a body of primary research already exists (e.g., "What is the effectiveness of X intervention for Y population?" or "What are the perceived barriers to Z behavior among A group?").


• Nature of Literature: When there are multiple empirical studies on your specific topic, and you need to rigorously synthesize their findings to draw robust conclusions.


• Dissertation Structure:


• **The Systematic Review is the Dissertation:** Some dissertations (especially at the Master's level, but also PhDs in some fields) are entirely a systematic review, providing a significant standalone contribution to knowledge.


• **A Chapter Within the Dissertation:** It can be one of your empirical chapters, serving to establish the current state of evidence on a specific aspect of your topic, which then informs or justifies your subsequent primary research.


• Preliminary Work: It can be conducted as a crucial first step to inform the design of your primary research, identify specific gaps that your study will address, or justify the need for your empirical study.


• Contribution: A well-executed systematic review is a significant and publishable contribution, offering the highest level of evidence synthesis.

Example Use: If your dissertation is investigating the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction interventions for healthcare professionals, a systematic review (potentially with meta-analysis) would be the most appropriate method to synthesize existing randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

---

Hybrid Approaches & Scoping Reviews:

It's also worth noting that there are hybrid approaches and other review types:

• Scoping Review: Aims to map the existing literature on a broad topic, identify the nature and extent of research, and highlight gaps. It uses systematic search methods but may not critically appraise studies in the same depth as a systematic review. Often used when a topic is complex, has not been comprehensively reviewed, or when you want to define the parameters for a future systematic review.


• Integrative Review: Broader than systematic reviews, allowing for the inclusion of diverse methodologies (e.g., both qualitative and quantitative studies) to develop a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon. Less rigorous than a systematic review in its inclusion/exclusion, but more structured than a narrative review.

For your dissertation, discuss these options with your supervisor. They will have a strong understanding of the expectations within your department and discipline and can guide you towards the most appropriate approach for your specific research question and goals.