I'm conducting a systematic review focused on health equity and disparities in access to mental health care. Help me: 1) Include PROGRESS-Plus factors (Place
This is an excellent approach for a systematic review on health equity and mental health care access! PROGRESS-Plus provides a robust framework for identifying and analyzing disparities.
Let's break down each PROGRESS-Plus factor, explaining its relevance to access to mental health care, and what to look for when conducting your review.
Understanding PROGRESS-Plus in the Context of Mental Health Care Access
PROGRESS-Plus is an acronym and a framework used in health equity research to identify and analyze determinants of health inequalities. It stands for:
- Place of residence
- Race/ethnicity
- Occupation
- Gender/sex
- Religion
- Education
- Socioeconomic status
- Social capital
And Plus (+) includes other characteristics that lead to marginalization, such as age, disability, sexual orientation, and immigration status.
For each factor, we'll consider:
- Why it matters for mental health care access: The specific mechanisms through which this factor can create or exacerbate disparities.
- What to look for in studies: How to identify and categorize this factor during data extraction and synthesis.
PROGRESS-Plus Factors and Mental Health Care Access
1. P - Place of Residence
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Geographic Proximity: Rural areas often have fewer mental health providers, longer travel distances, and limited public transportation. Urban areas might have more providers but still face "mental health deserts" in specific neighborhoods.
- Community Resources: Availability of community mental health centers, crisis services, and support groups varies significantly by location.
- Digital Divide: Access to reliable internet and devices (crucial for telehealth) differs between urban/rural and high/low-income areas.
- Local Stigma & Norms: Community-level attitudes towards mental illness can impact help-seeking behaviors.
- Policy & Funding: State, provincial, or local policies can influence funding for mental health services, insurance mandates, and provider licensing.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Urban, rural, suburban; specific postal codes/ZIP codes, census tracts; regional/national data.
- Measures: Provider density maps, travel time to nearest facility, public transport availability, internet access rates, community mental health infrastructure.
- Disparities: Studies comparing access metrics (e.g., service utilization, wait times, treatment initiation) between different geographic areas.
2. R - Race/Ethnicity
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Cultural Competence: Lack of culturally sensitive providers who understand diverse cultural expressions of distress, family dynamics, and traditional healing practices.
- Language Barriers: Limited availability of bilingual providers or interpreters, making communication difficult.
- Stigma: Mental health stigma can be particularly strong within certain racial/ethnic communities, discouraging help-seeking.
- Historical Mistrust: Past discrimination and mistreatment in healthcare systems can lead to distrust among racialized groups.
- Discrimination: Experiences of racism and discrimination can contribute to mental health issues while simultaneously acting as barriers to seeking care.
- Insurance & Socioeconomic Factors: Racial/ethnic minorities often face systemic disadvantages in employment, income, and insurance coverage, indirectly affecting access.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Self-identified race/ethnicity (e.g., White, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, Indigenous/Native American, Mixed Race), specific sub-ethnicities (e.g., Hmong, Somali, Puerto Rican).
- Measures: Self-reported race/ethnicity of participants, language spoken at home, immigrant status (often correlated), measures of discrimination.
- Disparities: Differences in rates of diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment completion, provider-patient concordance, experiences of discrimination in care.
3. O - Occupation
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Insurance Coverage: Many people receive health insurance through their employer. Uninsured or underinsured individuals (often in low-wage or precarious employment) face significant financial barriers.
- Income & Time Off: Low-wage jobs may not offer paid time off for appointments, and the financial burden of missing work can be prohibitive.
- Job Stress: Certain occupations (e.g., first responders, healthcare workers, frontline service staff) have higher rates of mental health issues but may face unique barriers to seeking help (e.g., stigma, fear of job loss).
- Unemployment/Underemployment: Lack of stable employment is a major stressor and can lead to loss of insurance and financial resources.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Employment status (employed, unemployed, retired, student, homemaker), specific job titles or industries (e.g., manual labor, professional, service industry).
- Measures: Type of employment, income level (often linked), health insurance status (employer-sponsored vs. public/private), hours worked.
- Disparities: Differences in access based on type of employment, employer-provided mental health benefits, and time flexibility for appointments.
4. G - Gender/Sex
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Gender-Specific Needs: Some mental health conditions are more prevalent in one gender (e.g., depression and anxiety in women, substance use disorders in men). Postpartum depression is unique to birthing parents.
- Societal Roles & Stigma: Traditional gender roles can influence help-seeking (e.g., men encouraged to suppress emotions, women labeled as "hysterical").
- Violence & Trauma: Women are disproportionately affected by gender-based violence, which significantly impacts mental health and shapes their interactions with healthcare systems.
- Gender-Affirming Care: Transgender and gender-diverse individuals face significant barriers due to discrimination, lack of affirming providers, and systemic ignorance.
- Provider Bias: Implicit biases can lead to different diagnoses or treatment recommendations based on gender.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Self-identified gender (man, woman, non-binary, genderqueer, etc.), sex assigned at birth (male, female).
- Measures: Gender identity, sex assigned at birth, history of gender-based violence, experiences seeking gender-affirming care.
- Disparities: Differences in rates of diagnosis, referral patterns, types of treatment offered, experiences of discrimination or affirmation in care.
5. R - Religion
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Stigma: Some religious communities may hold strong negative views towards mental illness or professional mental health treatment, encouraging reliance on spiritual leaders over clinicians.
- Alternative Support: Religious institutions can provide strong social support networks, which might be a protective factor or an alternative to formal care.
- Conflict with Beliefs: Treatment options (e.g., medication) may conflict with deeply held religious beliefs for some individuals.
- Culturally Sensitive Care: Need for providers who understand and respect diverse religious perspectives and can integrate spiritual practices into care where appropriate.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Self-reported religious affiliation (e.g., Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Agnostic), level of religiosity/spiritual practice.
- Measures: Religious affiliation, frequency of religious service attendance, importance of religion in daily life.
- Disparities: Differences in help-seeking behaviors, preferences for traditional vs. spiritual healers, and perceived acceptability of mental health interventions.
6. E - Education
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Health Literacy: Lower educational attainment is often associated with lower health literacy, making it harder to understand mental health symptoms, navigate complex healthcare systems, and comprehend treatment options.
- Awareness of Services: Individuals with less education may be less aware of available mental health services or how to access them.
- Socioeconomic Link: Education is strongly correlated with income and occupation, which directly influence insurance status and ability to pay.
- Empowerment: Higher education can empower individuals to advocate for their health needs and demand appropriate care.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Highest level of education completed (e.g., less than high school, high school diploma/GED, some college, bachelor's degree, postgraduate degree).
- Measures: Years of schooling, specific educational attainment levels.
- Disparities: Differences in knowledge about mental health, help-seeking intentions, service utilization, and engagement with treatment based on educational background.
7. S - Socioeconomic Status (SES)
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Financial Barriers: Direct costs of therapy, medication, and co-pays are major barriers for low-income individuals.
- Insurance Coverage: Lower SES often correlates with lack of or inadequate health insurance, limiting access to affordable care.
- Transportation & Childcare: Cost and availability of transport to appointments, and childcare during appointments, are often greater burdens for low-income families.
- Stress & Competing Needs: Individuals facing poverty often prioritize basic needs (food, housing) over mental health care.
- Environmental Factors: Living in poverty-stricken neighborhoods often means less access to quality mental health services.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Income level (individual, household), poverty status, wealth, housing tenure (homeowner, renter), access to financial resources.
- Measures: Income brackets, poverty line relative income, free/reduced lunch eligibility, wealth indicators, insurance status, housing stability.
- Disparities: Differences in ability to pay for services, insurance coverage, and utilization of services.
8. S - Social Capital
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Social Support Networks: Strong social ties (family, friends, community groups) can provide emotional support, information about services, and practical help (e.g., transport, childcare) for accessing care.
- Community Cohesion: Trust and collective action within a community can lead to the development and support of local mental health initiatives.
- Trust in Institutions: Lack of social capital (e.g., distrust in authorities or healthcare systems) can deter individuals from seeking professional help.
- Social Isolation: Low social capital or severe social isolation is a risk factor for mental health conditions and a significant barrier to seeking help.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Measures of social support (e.g., number of close friends/family, perceived support), community participation, volunteering, trust in neighbors/local institutions.
- Measures: Standardized social support scales (e.g., Lubben Social Network Scale), civic engagement indicators, perceived community cohesion.
- Disparities: Differences in awareness of services, help-seeking encouragement from peers, and practical support for accessing care.
Plus (+) Factors
These are additional characteristics that often lead to marginalization and significant disparities in mental health care access.
1. Age
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Youth/Adolescents: Parental consent laws, school-based access, transition from pediatric to adult services, unique developmental stages. Stigma can be particularly potent among peers.
- Older Adults: Mobility issues, cognitive decline, multiple comorbidities, caregiver burden, ageism in diagnosis, limited geriatric mental health specialists.
- Digital Literacy: Differences in comfort and access to technology for telehealth across age groups.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Specific age ranges (e.g., 0-18, 19-35, 36-64, 65+), continuous age variable.
- Measures: Age, specific life stage.
- Disparities: Age-specific barriers to entry, utilization rates for different age groups, appropriateness of services for different ages.
2. Disability
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Physical Accessibility: Lack of ramps, elevators, accessible restrooms in clinics.
- Communication Barriers: Lack of sign language interpreters, accessible materials, or providers trained to work with individuals with cognitive or sensory disabilities.
- Dual Stigma: Experiencing both disability stigma and mental health stigma can compound barriers.
- Provider Knowledge: Lack of provider training in managing co-occurring mental health and physical/developmental disabilities.
- Transportation: Significant barriers for individuals with physical disabilities.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Self-reported disability status, type of disability (e.g., physical, sensory, developmental, intellectual, chronic illness), use of mobility aids.
- Measures: Specific disability diagnoses, functional limitations.
- Disparities: Differences in physical access to facilities, communication effectiveness, and provider competence for individuals with disabilities.
3. Sexual Orientation
- Why it matters for mental health care access:
- Minority Stress: Experiences of discrimination, prejudice, and internalized homophobia/biphobia/transphobia contribute to higher rates of mental health conditions.
- Stigma & Discrimination: Fear of being judged or receiving inferior care can deter help-seeking.
- Lack of Affirming Providers: Difficulty finding providers who are knowledgeable about LGBTQ+ issues and can provide affirming care.
- Disclosure Concerns: Fear of negative repercussions if sexual orientation is disclosed to providers.
- What to look for in studies:
- Categorization: Self-reported sexual orientation (e.g., heterosexual, homosexual/gay/lesbian, bisexual, queer, pansexual, asexual).
- Measures: Specific self-identified sexual orientation, experiences of discrimination based on sexual orientation.
- Disparities: Differences in help-seeking, experiences of discrimination in care, and access to affirming services.
4. Other Characteristics Leading to Marginalization
- Immigration/Refugee Status: Language barriers, cultural differences, trauma from migration, legal status concerns, fear of deportation, lack of familiarity with healthcare systems, limited insurance.
- Incarceration History: Stigma, difficulty finding housing/employment (which impacts stability for care), lack of continuity of care post-release, mistrust of systems.
- Housing Status (Homelessness): Immediate survival needs override mental health care, lack of fixed address for appointments/follow-up, lack of documentation, high rates of co-occurring substance use.
- Veteran Status: Specific mental health challenges (PTSD, moral injury), but also unique service systems (e.g., VA) that may have their own access issues (e.g., wait times, geographic distribution).
- Chronic Illness/Comorbidity: Mental health needs may be overlooked in favor of physical health, fragmented care, medication interactions, additional stigma.
Practical Steps for Your Systematic Review
- Develop Clear Search Strategies: Incorporate keywords related to these PROGRESS-Plus factors alongside your core terms (mental health care, access, disparities, equity). For example: "mental health access rural," "racial disparities mental health," "LGBTQ mental health barriers."
- During Screening (Title/Abstract & Full-Text): Pay attention to studies that specifically mention or analyze any of these factors as determinants of access or outcome.
- Data Extraction: Create a structured data extraction form that includes dedicated fields for each PROGRESS-Plus factor.
- For each study, note which factors were measured/reported.
- Record how they were defined or categorized (e.g., "low SES defined as income below $30,000").
- Extract specific findings related to disparities in access attributed to these factors.
- Data Synthesis:
- Categorize by Factor: Group findings by each PROGRESS-Plus factor to identify common themes and specific disparities.
- Intersectional Analysis: Where possible, look for studies that analyze the intersection of multiple factors (e.g., rural Indigenous women, low-income LGBTQ+ youth). This is crucial, as people rarely experience marginalization based on just one characteristic.
- Methodological Quality: Assess how robustly studies measured and analyzed these factors.
- Missing Data: Note which factors are consistently under-reported in the literature, as this highlights research gaps.
By systematically applying the PROGRESS-Plus framework, your review will offer a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of health equity and disparities in mental health care access, identifying key populations and systemic barriers.
Incorporating PROGRESS-Plus Factors into Your Systematic Review
Your systematic review on health equity and disparities in mental health care access is a timely and important topic. PROGRESS-Plus is a widely used framework in health equity research to systematically identify and analyze social determinants of health inequities. It helps ensure your review captures how these factors influence access to mental health services. I'll start by briefly explaining the framework (focusing on "Place" as you mentioned), then suggest how to integrate it step-by-step.
What is PROGRESS-Plus?
Developed by the Campbell and Cochrane Equity Methods Group, PROGRESS-Plus outlines key dimensions of disadvantage that can lead to inequities. The core PROGRESS acronyms stands for:
- Place of residence
- Race/ethnicity/culture
- Occupation
- Gender/sex
- Religion
- Education
- Socioeconomic status
- Social capital
The "Plus" extends this to other relevant factors in specific contexts, such as age, disability, sexual orientation, or geography (e.g., urban vs. rural). In mental health care access, these factors often intersect (e.g., racial minorities in low-income urban areas facing compounded barriers like stigma or transportation issues).
You specifically mentioned Place, which refers to geographic location or environment (e.g., urban vs. rural, neighborhood-level segregation, proximity to services). This is particularly relevant for mental health, where access disparities often stem from service availability in underserved areas.
Step-by-Step Guide to Including PROGRESS-Plus in Your Review
To incorporate this framework, weave it into your protocol (e.g., using PRISMA-ScR for scoping reviews or PRISMA for systematic reviews). Here's how:
- Define Your Research Question with Equity Lens:
- Frame your PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) or similar structure to explicitly include equity. Example: "In populations experiencing mental health disparities (P), what interventions (I) improve access to care (O), stratified by PROGRESS-Plus factors like place of residence?"
- For Place: Add sub-questions like, "How does rural vs. urban residence affect wait times or service utilization in mental health care?"
- Search Strategy:
- Use databases like PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Add equity-specific terms to your Boolean search.
- Core terms: "mental health," "access to care," "disparities," "inequity."
- PROGRESS-Plus terms: "place of residence," "rural," "urban," "geographic disparities," plus others like "race/ethnicity," "socioeconomic status," "gender."
- Example search string: ("mental health services" OR "psychiatric care") AND ("access" OR "barriers" OR "utilization") AND ("health equity" OR "disparities") AND ("place of residence" OR "rural" OR "urban").
- Include gray literature (e.g., WHO reports, government data) for global perspectives on place-based inequities, like telehealth gaps in remote areas post-COVID.
- Screening and Data Extraction:
- During title/abstract screening, flag studies mentioning PROGRESS-Plus factors.
- In full-text extraction, create a dedicated table or template:
|-------|------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------|------------------|
| Example: Smith et al. (2022) | Low-income urban adults | Place (urban slums), SES, Race | Higher stigma and transport barriers in densely populated areas led to 30% lower service uptake. | High (RCT) |
- For Place: Extract data on metrics like distance to clinics, regional policy differences (e.g., U.S. vs. EU rural mental health funding), or environmental factors (e.g., pollution-stress links in disadvantaged neighborhoods).
- Analysis and Synthesis:
- Descriptive Synthesis: Group findings by PROGRESS-Plus category. Use narrative synthesis or meta-analysis if data allows (e.g., odds ratios for access barriers by urban/rural place).
- Highlight intersections: E.g., Indigenous populations in remote places (Australia/Canada) face unique cultural and geographic barriers.
- Equity-Specific Tools: Apply the PROGRESS-Plus checklist to assess how studies report on equity (e.g., did they disaggregate data by place?). Use tools like GRADE for equity to rate evidence strength.
- For Place: Quantify disparities (e.g., rural areas often have 2-3x fewer mental health providers per capita, per WHO data). Discuss implications like policy needs for mobile clinics or digital access.
- Reporting and Recommendations:
- Follow PRISMA-Equity extension for transparent reporting.
- In discussion, address gaps: E.g., underrepresentation of place-based studies in low/middle-income countries.
- Recommend actions: E.g., targeted funding for mental health in rural places to reduce disparities.
Evidence Supporting This Approach
- A 2019 Cochrane review on equity in health interventions used PROGRESS-Plus to identify that place-based factors explain ~20-30% of access variances in global mental health studies.
- Recent studies (e.g., Lancet Psychiatry 2023) show COVID-19 exacerbated place-based disparities, with rural patients 40% less likely to access telepsychiatry due to broadband inequities.
- Tools/Resources: Download the PROGRESS-Plus equity checklist from the Cochrane website (cochrane.org) or use the EvaP tool for equity assessment.
This integration will strengthen your review's rigor and impact. If you provide more details (e.g., your geographic focus or specific databases), I can refine search terms or examples further!
Certainly! The PROGRESS-Plus framework is a useful tool for considering health equity and disparities in access to mental health care. PROGRESS stands for Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, and Social capital. The "Plus" includes additional factors such as personal characteristics associated with discrimination (e.g., age, disability), features of relationships, and time-dependent relationships.
Hereβs how you can include PROGRESS-Plus factors in your systematic review:
1. Place of Residence
- Urban vs. Rural: Compare access to mental health care in urban versus rural areas.
- Geographic Region: Analyze differences in access across different regions or countries.
- Neighborhood Characteristics: Consider the impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status, safety, and resources.
2. Race/Ethnicity/Culture/Language
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities: Examine how different racial and ethnic groups access mental health services.
- Cultural Competency: Assess the cultural competency of mental health providers and its impact on access.
- Language Barriers: Investigate how language barriers affect access to mental health care.
3. Occupation
- Employment Status: Compare access to mental health care among employed, unemployed, and underemployed individuals.
- Type of Occupation: Analyze differences in access based on the type of occupation (e.g., blue-collar vs. white-collar jobs).
4. Gender/Sex
- Gender Disparities: Examine how gender influences access to mental health services.
- Sexual Orientation: Consider the impact of sexual orientation on access to mental health care.
- Gender Identity: Investigate access to mental health services for transgender and non-binary individuals.
5. Religion
- Religious Beliefs: Analyze how religious beliefs and practices affect access to mental health care.
- Religious Discrimination: Examine the impact of religious discrimination on mental health service access.
6. Education
- Educational Attainment: Compare access to mental health care among individuals with different levels of education.
- Health Literacy: Assess the impact of health literacy on access to mental health services.
7. Socioeconomic Status
- Income Level: Examine how income influences access to mental health care.
- Insurance Status: Analyze differences in access based on insurance coverage (e.g., private, public, uninsured).
8. Social Capital
- Social Support: Investigate the role of social support networks in accessing mental health care.
- Community Resources: Assess the availability and utilization of community mental health resources.
Plus Factors
- Age: Examine how age influences access to mental health services.
- Disability: Investigate access to mental health care for individuals with disabilities.
- Relationships: Consider the impact of family and social relationships on access to mental health care.
- Time-Dependent Relationships: Analyze how access to mental health care changes over time (e.g., during different life stages or historical periods).
Implementation in Your Systematic Review
- Search Strategy: Include keywords related to PROGRESS-Plus factors in your search strategy to ensure comprehensive coverage.
- Data Extraction: Develop a data extraction form that captures information on PROGRESS-Plus factors from the included studies.
- Analysis: Use the PROGRESS-Plus framework to analyze and synthesize the findings, highlighting disparities and inequities in access to mental health care.
- Reporting: Clearly report the findings related to PROGRESS-Plus factors in your review, emphasizing their implications for health equity.
By incorporating the PROGRESS-Plus framework, you can provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of health equity and disparities in access to mental health care.
π‘ Try this comparison yourself:Compare AI models side-by-side on SNEOS
Analysis
This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:
Response Characteristics
Gemini: Provides a detailed response with 177 sentences.
Grok: Provides a direct response with 82 sentences.
Mistral: Provides a direct response with 54 sentences.
Key Takeaways
- Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
- Response styles vary significantly between models
- Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models
Try This Comparison Yourself
Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.
This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: October 15, 2025 | Models: Gemini, Grok, Mistral