The topic of compliance in banking with respect to marijuana-related businesses (MRBs) is complex and heavily influenced by the legal and regulatory landscape, which varies by country and, in the United States, by state. Below, I’ll outline the key considerations for banking and compliance in relation to marijuana businesses, focusing primarily on the U.S. context since it’s one of the most challenging and frequently discussed environments.

---

Background: Legal Conflict in the U.S.

• Federal Law: Marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under the U.S. Controlled Substances Act (CSA), meaning it is federally illegal to manufacture, distribute, or possess marijuana.


• State Laws: As of 2023, many states (e.g., Colorado, California, Oregon) have legalized marijuana for medical and/or recreational use. However, this does not override federal law, creating a conflict.


• Banking Challenges: Due to federal illegality, many banks and financial institutions are hesitant to provide services to MRBs out of fear of violating federal laws, such as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) or anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.

---

Key Compliance Issues for Banks Serving Marijuana Businesses

Banks that choose to serve MRBs must navigate a complex web of regulations and risks. Here are the main considerations:

• Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Compliance:


• Banks are required to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) for transactions that may involve illegal activity, including marijuana-related transactions.


• The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, issued guidance in 2014 (known as the "FinCEN Guidance") to help banks manage risks when working with MRBs. This guidance outlines due diligence and reporting requirements:


• Marijuana Limited SARs: For MRBs that are compliant with state laws and do not raise red flags, banks file these SARs to report transactions without indicating suspicion of illegal activity.


• Marijuana Priority SARs: If there are indications of fraud, diversion of funds, or other suspicious activities, banks must file a priority SAR.


• Marijuana Termination SARs: If a bank decides to terminate a relationship with an MRB due to compliance concerns, it must file a termination SAR.


• Banks must implement robust AML programs, including Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, to monitor MRB accounts and ensure they are not facilitating illegal activities.


• Risk Management:


• Legal Risk: Providing banking services to MRBs could expose banks to federal penalties, including fines or loss of their charter, even if the MRB is state-legal.


• Reputational Risk: Some banks avoid MRBs due to the stigma associated with the industry or concerns about alienating other customers.


• Operational Risk: The additional compliance burden (e.g., filing SARs, enhanced due diligence) increases costs and resource allocation for banks.


• FinCEN Guidance and Due Diligence:


• Under the 2014 FinCEN Guidance, banks must conduct thorough due diligence on MRBs to ensure they comply with state laws and do not pose a risk of money laundering or other crimes.


• Key due diligence steps include:


• Verifying that the MRB is licensed and compliant with state regulations.


• Reviewing the MRB’s business operations and supply chain.


• Monitoring transactions for red flags, such as cash-heavy transactions or discrepancies in reported revenue.


• Banks must also assess whether the MRB aligns with the "Cole Memorandum" priorities (a 2013 Department of Justice memo, since rescinded, but still referenced in FinCEN guidance), which focus on preventing distribution to minors, diversion to illegal markets, and other public safety concerns.


• Limited Federal Protections:


• There is no federal safe harbor for banks serving MRBs. Even with FinCEN guidance, banks operate in a legally gray area.


• Legislative proposals like the SAFE Banking Act (Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act) have been introduced in Congress to provide protections for financial institutions serving state-legal MRBs. If passed, this act would prevent federal banking regulators from penalizing banks for working with MRBs and allow access to federal payment systems. However, as of 2023, it has not been enacted into law.

---

Challenges for Marijuana Businesses in Accessing Banking Services

Due to the risks outlined above, many banks refuse to serve MRBs, creating significant challenges for these businesses:

• Cash-Only Operations: Without access to banking services, many MRBs operate on a cash-only basis, which increases the risk of theft, fraud, and money laundering.


• Limited Financial Services: Even when banks do provide services, they may limit offerings (e.g., no loans or credit lines) or charge high fees to offset compliance costs.


• Alternative Banking Solutions: Some MRBs turn to credit unions, fintech companies, or state-chartered banks, which may be more willing to take on the risk, but these options are not universally available.

---

State-Level Efforts to Support Banking for MRBs

Some states have taken steps to address the banking challenges faced by MRBs:

• Public Banking Initiatives: States like California and New York have explored or established public banks or special-purpose financial institutions to serve MRBs.


• State Guidance: Certain states provide guidelines or assurances to financial institutions to encourage banking services for MRBs, though these do not eliminate federal risks.

---

International Perspective

Outside the U.S., the banking landscape for marijuana businesses depends on national laws:

• Canada: Marijuana is federally legal for recreational and medical use (since 2018), so banks can serve cannabis businesses without the federal-state conflict seen in the U.S. However, AML and KYC compliance remains critical.


• Europe: In countries like the Netherlands, where marijuana is tolerated or partially legalized, banking services are generally available but still subject to strict AML regulations.


• Developing Markets: In regions where marijuana remains illegal, banks typically avoid serving MRBs to comply with local laws.

---

Best Practices for Banks Considering MRB Clients

For banks willing to take on the risk of serving MRBs, the following best practices can help ensure compliance:

• Develop a comprehensive MRB policy outlining risk tolerance and due diligence procedures.


• Train staff on FinCEN guidance and state-specific marijuana laws.


• Implement enhanced monitoring systems for MRB accounts to detect suspicious activity.


• Maintain detailed records of due diligence and SAR filings to demonstrate compliance in case of regulatory scrutiny.


• Partner with legal and compliance experts to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape.

---

Future Outlook

The future of banking for marijuana businesses depends on legislative and regulatory developments:

• Federal Legalization: If marijuana is descheduled or rescheduled at the federal level in the U.S., banks would likely face fewer barriers to serving MRBs.


• SAFE Banking Act: Passage of this legislation could significantly increase access to financial services for MRBs by protecting banks from federal penalties.


• State-Level Innovations: Continued efforts by states to create banking solutions (e.g., public banks) may provide interim relief for MRBs.

---

Conclusion

Compliance in banking for marijuana-related businesses is a high-risk, high-effort endeavor due to the conflict between federal and state laws in the U.S. and the stringent regulatory requirements for financial institutions. Banks must weigh the potential benefits against legal, reputational, and operational risks while adhering to BSA/AML regulations and FinCEN guidance. For MRBs, the lack of reliable banking access remains a significant hurdle, often forcing cash-only operations. Legislative changes, such as the SAFE Banking Act or federal legalization, could resolve many of these issues, but until then, the industry remains in a state of uncertainty.

If you have a specific angle or jurisdiction in mind (e.g., a particular state or country), let me know, and I can dive deeper!