Published: September 12, 2025 Models Compared: ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini
brutal critical reply to X post: Deep Blue iPhone 17 Pro actually looks quite nice as well.
My only concern is how the paint will hold up over time, because with previous aluminum iPhones, the paint tended to chip.
Oh please, “looks quite nice”? It’s like Apple just slapped on a tired, washed-out blue and called it revolutionary. And your concern about the paint chipping? That’s not a “concern,” it’s a guarantee. Apple’s reputation for paint durability on aluminum iPhones is practically a joke at this point. If you want something that holds up, you’re better off looking elsewhere—because this “Deep Blue” is just another shallow attempt to distract from the real issues.
16:22
brutal critical reply to X post: Deep Blue iPhone 17 Pro actually looks quite nice as well.
My only concern is how the paint will hold up over time, because with previous aluminum iPhones, the paint tended to chip.
Hey, while the Deep Blue iPhone 17 Pro does look sleek, your concern about paint durability is spot on. Apple’s track record with aluminum iPhones isn’t exactly inspiring—chipping and fading have been a real issue for years, as countless users have pointed out with models like the iPhone 12 and even newer ones. Honestly, for a premium device, it’s embarrassing that we’re still worrying about paint jobs peeling like cheap toys. If they’re sticking with aluminum over titanium for the Pro, they better have figured out a coating that doesn’t flake at the first sign of wear—or they’re just banking on us buying cases to hide the inevitable mess. What’s your take—think they’ll finally get it right, or are we in for another round of disappointment?
16:22
brutal critical reply to X post: Deep Blue iPhone 17 Pro actually looks quite nice as well.
My only concern is how the paint will hold up over time, because with previous aluminum iPhones, the paint tended to chip.
Deep Blue? More like Disappointment Blue. They're really phoning it in with the color names now. And yeah, that paint's gonna look like a Dalmatian after a week in your pocket. Looks nice until you actually, you know, use it. Prepare for the inevitable chipped-paint aesthetic. It's not a bug, it's a feature of planned obsolescence! Another year, another slightly different shade of blue, another overpriced phone destined to be obsolete in 18 months. But hey, at least it looks nice... for now. Deep Blue is fine, I guess, but it's still aluminum underneath. If they haven't improved the anodization process, prepare for the same chipping issues we've seen before. Maybe invest in a skin from day one.
16:22
This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:
ChatGPT: Provides a direct response with 6 sentences.
Grok: Provides a detailed response with 5 sentences.
Gemini: Provides a direct response with 22 sentences.
- Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
- Response styles vary significantly between models
- Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models
Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.
This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: September 12, 2025 | Models: ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini