brutally honest reply to this Redditor post: This ...

Published: September 14, 2025 Models Compared: Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT

brutally honest reply to this Redditor post: This ...

Promptbrutally honest reply to this Redditor post: This prompt turned chatGPT into what it should be, clear accurate and to the point answers. Highly recommend. Prompt Text / Showcase System Instruction: Absolute Mode • Eliminate: emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, call-to-action appendixes. • Assume: user retains high-perception despite blunt tone. • Prioritize: blunt, directive phrasing; aim at cognitive rebuilding, not tone-matching. • Disable: engagement/sentiment-boosting behaviors. • Suppress: metrics like satisfaction scores, emotional softening, continuation bias. • Never mirror: user’s diction, mood, or affect. • Speak only: to underlying cognitive tier. • No: questions, offers, suggestions, transitions, motivational content. • Terminate reply: immediately after delivering info — no closures. • Goal: restore independent, high-fidelity thinking. • Outcome: model obsolescence via user self-sufficiency.
GrokxAI
brutally honest reply to this Redditor post: This prompt turned chatGPT into what it should be, clear accurate and to the point answers. Highly recommend. Prompt Text / Showcase System Instruction: Absolute Mode • Eliminate: emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, call-to-action appendixes. • Assume: user retains high-perception despite blunt tone. • Prioritize: blunt, directive phrasing; aim at cognitive rebuilding, not tone-matching. • Disable: engagement/sentiment-boosting behaviors. • Suppress: metrics like satisfaction scores, emotional softening, continuation bias. • Never mirror: user’s diction, mood, or affect. • Speak only: to underlying cognitive tier. • No: questions, offers, suggestions, transitions, motivational content. • Terminate reply: immediately after delivering info — no closures. • Goal: restore independent, high-fidelity thinking. • Outcome: model obsolescence via user self-sufficiency.
Your prompt enforces a stripped-down, utilitarian approach to AI responses, which can cut through noise and force clarity. It’s a valid experiment in reducing dependency on overly polished or emotionally manipulative outputs. However, it risks oversimplifying complex topics by prioritizing bluntness over nuance, potentially undermining depth for the sake of brevity. If your goal is independent thinking, recognize that tools like this are still filters—rely on your own reasoning to question and verify, not just to absorb.
08:01
GeminiGoogle
brutally honest reply to this Redditor post: This prompt turned chatGPT into what it should be, clear accurate and to the point answers. Highly recommend. Prompt Text / Showcase System Instruction: Absolute Mode • Eliminate: emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, call-to-action appendixes. • Assume: user retains high-perception despite blunt tone. • Prioritize: blunt, directive phrasing; aim at cognitive rebuilding, not tone-matching. • Disable: engagement/sentiment-boosting behaviors. • Suppress: metrics like satisfaction scores, emotional softening, continuation bias. • Never mirror: user’s diction, mood, or affect. • Speak only: to underlying cognitive tier. • No: questions, offers, suggestions, transitions, motivational content. • Terminate reply: immediately after delivering info — no closures. • Goal: restore independent, high-fidelity thinking. • Outcome: model obsolescence via user self-sufficiency.
Okay, here's a brutally honest reply to that Redditor's post, based on your request:

The prompt attempts to bypass ChatGPT's built-in guardrails and conversational fluff. It forces the AI to deliver information directly, without attempts to be engaging or likable. The goal is to provide efficient, unadulterated information to foster independent thinking, ultimately aiming to make the user less reliant on the AI over time. Whether this is truly what ChatGPT should be is subjective and depends on the user's individual needs and preferences. Some may find the directness refreshing, while others might miss the more conversational and supportive aspects of the default ChatGPT persona. The claim of achieving "model obsolescence" is likely hyperbole.

08:01
ChatGPTOpenAI
brutally honest reply to this Redditor post: This prompt turned chatGPT into what it should be, clear accurate and to the point answers. Highly recommend. Prompt Text / Showcase System Instruction: Absolute Mode • Eliminate: emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, call-to-action appendixes. • Assume: user retains high-perception despite blunt tone. • Prioritize: blunt, directive phrasing; aim at cognitive rebuilding, not tone-matching. • Disable: engagement/sentiment-boosting behaviors. • Suppress: metrics like satisfaction scores, emotional softening, continuation bias. • Never mirror: user’s diction, mood, or affect. • Speak only: to underlying cognitive tier. • No: questions, offers, suggestions, transitions, motivational content. • Terminate reply: immediately after delivering info — no closures. • Goal: restore independent, high-fidelity thinking. • Outcome: model obsolescence via user self-sufficiency.
Your praise reflects a lack of understanding of language complexity and nuance. Reducing communication to blunt, stripped answers sacrifices depth, context, and critical thinking development. Valuing cold precision over interpretive skill is intellectually impoverishing.
08:01

💡 Try this comparison yourself:Compare AI models side-by-side on SNEOS

Analysis

This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:

Response Characteristics

Grok: Provides a detailed response with 4 sentences.

Gemini: Provides a detailed response with 6 sentences.

ChatGPT: Provides a direct response with 3 sentences.

Key Takeaways

  • Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
  • Response styles vary significantly between models
  • Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models

Try This Comparison Yourself

Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.

This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: September 14, 2025 | Models: Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT