reply to Najmus, note that if you want less compli...

Promptreply to Najmus, note that if you want less complications then you need to specify it in your prompts, communicate with AI not just stand on a side: With the increase of AI coding tools these verbose coding patterns are also becoming more visible. As per my observation all common models have a bias towards unnecessary complexity. Extra classes, functions and code blocks that don’t actually add value. Developers often write this type of code to make their code look “enterprise-grade” or to tick a box in their team’s coding patterns. Since AI coding tools are trained on tons of such code bases, it ends up copying and spreading it. Fellow vibe coders and professional developers, there’s nothing wrong with using these AI coding tools but don’t fall in the trap of elegance over simplicity. Don’t over-engineer. Always stick to first principles. Always question why a given practice is being applied, and adopt it only if it truly solves a problem for you.
ChatGPTOpenAI
reply to Najmus, note that if you want less complications then you need to specify it in your prompts, communicate with AI not just stand on a side: With the increase of AI coding tools these verbose coding patterns are also becoming more visible. As per my observation all common models have a bias towards unnecessary complexity. Extra classes, functions and code blocks that don’t actually add value. Developers often write this type of code to make their code look “enterprise-grade” or to tick a box in their team’s coding patterns. Since AI coding tools are trained on tons of such code bases, it ends up copying and spreading it. Fellow vibe coders and professional developers, there’s nothing wrong with using these AI coding tools but don’t fall in the trap of elegance over simplicity. Don’t over-engineer. Always stick to first principles. Always question why a given practice is being applied, and adopt it only if it truly solves a problem for you.
Hi Najmus,

If you want to avoid unnecessary complications, it’s crucial to clearly specify that in your prompts when working with AI. Communication is key—don’t just stand on the sidelines expecting simpler outputs; guide the AI by being explicit about your preferences.

With the rise of AI coding tools, verbose and overly complex coding patterns have become more common. From what I’ve observed, most popular AI models tend to favor adding extra classes, functions, and code blocks that don’t necessarily add value. This usually stems from the training data filled with “enterprise-grade” style code, where developers sometimes over-engineer just to meet perceived standards or team conventions.

To all fellow vibe coders and professionals—using AI coding tools is great, but be cautious not to sacrifice simplicity for elegance. Avoid over-engineering your solutions. Always return to first principles, critically evaluate why a practice is being suggested, and adopt it only if it truly addresses a problem or improves your codebase.

Keep it simple and intentional!

Best,
[Your Name]

07:19
GrokxAI
reply to Najmus, note that if you want less complications then you need to specify it in your prompts, communicate with AI not just stand on a side: With the increase of AI coding tools these verbose coding patterns are also becoming more visible. As per my observation all common models have a bias towards unnecessary complexity. Extra classes, functions and code blocks that don’t actually add value. Developers often write this type of code to make their code look “enterprise-grade” or to tick a box in their team’s coding patterns. Since AI coding tools are trained on tons of such code bases, it ends up copying and spreading it. Fellow vibe coders and professional developers, there’s nothing wrong with using these AI coding tools but don’t fall in the trap of elegance over simplicity. Don’t over-engineer. Always stick to first principles. Always question why a given practice is being applied, and adopt it only if it truly solves a problem for you.
Hey Najmus, I completely agree with your observations about the tendency of AI coding tools to lean toward unnecessary complexity. You're spot on about how these tools, trained on vast codebases often filled with over-engineered patterns, replicate verbose structures like extra classes or functions that don't add real value. It’s a reflection of the "enterprise-grade" mindset some developers adopt to meet perceived standards rather than focusing on practicality.

Your advice to stick to first principles and prioritize simplicity over elegance is crucial. It’s a reminder that we, as developers, need to actively guide AI tools rather than passively accepting their output. I’ve found that being explicit in prompts—like specifying a preference for minimalistic, straightforward code—can help steer the AI away from overcomplicating things. It’s all about communicating intent clearly and not just standing on the sidelines, as you mentioned.

Thanks for highlighting this. It’s a great call to action for all of us to question every practice and ensure it genuinely solves a problem before adopting it. Let’s keep the focus on building clean, effective solutions!

07:19
GeminiGoogle
reply to Najmus, note that if you want less complications then you need to specify it in your prompts, communicate with AI not just stand on a side: With the increase of AI coding tools these verbose coding patterns are also becoming more visible. As per my observation all common models have a bias towards unnecessary complexity. Extra classes, functions and code blocks that don’t actually add value. Developers often write this type of code to make their code look “enterprise-grade” or to tick a box in their team’s coding patterns. Since AI coding tools are trained on tons of such code bases, it ends up copying and spreading it. Fellow vibe coders and professional developers, there’s nothing wrong with using these AI coding tools but don’t fall in the trap of elegance over simplicity. Don’t over-engineer. Always stick to first principles. Always question why a given practice is being applied, and adopt it only if it truly solves a problem for you.
Najmus, that's a really insightful point about the verbose coding patterns emerging from AI tools. I agree that these models often lean towards unnecessary complexity, generating extra code that doesn't really add value. It's like they're mimicking the "enterprise-grade" style that some developers adopt, perhaps without fully understanding the underlying reasons.

It's important to remember that we need to communicate effectively with these AI tools, not just passively accept their output. If you want less complicated code, you have to specifically ask for it in your prompts. It's about guiding the AI towards simplicity and questioning the practices it suggests. Don't fall into the trap of over-engineering just because the AI suggests it! As you said, always stick to first principles and question why a given practice is being applied.

07:19

Analysis

This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:

Response Characteristics

ChatGPT: Provides a detailed response with 9 sentences.

Grok: Provides a detailed response with 10 sentences.

Gemini: Provides a detailed response with 8 sentences.

Key Takeaways

  • Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
  • Response styles vary significantly between models
  • Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models

Try This Comparison Yourself

Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.


This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: September 23, 2025 | Models: ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini