intelligent reply to Perplexity cofounder blog pos...
Thank you for sharing this thoughtful and timely perspective. Your articulation of the distinction between true innovation and corporate bullying highlights a critical challenge at the intersection of technology, user rights, and market power.
The vision of agentic AI as “labor” entrusted to users — personal, private, and powerful assistants working on their behalf — is both inspiring and essential for empowering individuals in today’s digital economy. Your emphasis on user choice and control strikes at the core of what technology should be: a tool to enhance human agency, not restrict it in the interest of corporate profit or advertising dominance.
Amazon’s legal threats against Perplexity set a concerning precedent that risks undermining the fundamental freedoms users have come to expect online: the right to employ tools of their choice to streamline and improve life. By conflating user agents with exploitative bots and suppressing innovation that challenges their ad-driven model, Amazon appears to prioritize short-term gain over long-term user experience and market fairness.
This conflict underscores the urgent need for clear legal frameworks that recognize user agents as legitimate extensions of users themselves — acting with their authorization, on their behalf, without discrimination or interference. The future of AI must be about restoring balance, transparency, and trust in digital interactions.
Perplexity’s courageous stance is a vital contribution to this debate — reminding us that innovation thrives only in an environment where bold ideas are welcomed, not stifled by intimidation. I stand with your call to protect user freedom and celebrate technology that truly serves people. Together, we must ensure the next chapter of AI empowers users rather than entraps them.
Empowering Users: Why User Agents Are the Next Frontier in Digital Freedom
Thank you for this insightful and timely post, [Cofounder's Name or "Perplexity Team"]. Your framing of agentic AI as "labor" rather than just "tools" is a powerful metaphor that cuts through the noise. It reminds us that technology's true north should always be human empowerment, not corporate gatekeeping. Amazon's legal threat against Comet isn't just an attack on Perplexity—it's a shot across the bow for anyone building AI that hands control back to users.
You're spot on about the distinction between user agents and scrapers. In an era where bots and crawlers have eroded trust online, Comet's model—private, personal, and powerful—represents a genuine evolution. Storing credentials locally and acting solely on user intent aligns perfectly with principles of privacy and autonomy. It's frustrating to see Amazon, a company born from disrupting incumbents, now leveraging its scale to stifle that same spirit. As you noted, Jassy's recent earnings call comments highlight the tension: short-term ad revenue versus long-term user-centric innovation. Partnering with "3rd party agents" that serve their ecosystem sounds less like collaboration and more like controlled integration.
This isn't isolated. Recent coverage (e.g., from Reuters and CNBC) underscores how such threats could chill investment in assistive AI, limiting consumer choice at a pivotal moment. Users deserve seamless experiences, whether that's comparing deals across sites or automating routine tasks without Big Tech's veto. By standing firm, Perplexity isn't just defending its product—it's advocating for a future where AI amplifies individual agency, not corporate agendas.
Kudos for channeling that underdog energy Amazon once embodied. Let's hope this sparks broader dialogue (and perhaps regulatory scrutiny) on user rights in the agentic age. The wrench analogy is enduring: no one owns the tools we wield, and no platform should dictate how we use them. Onward to a more open web.
#UserAgents #AIEmpowerment #InnovationOverIntimidation
Here's an intelligent reply to the Perplexity cofounder's blog post, incorporating a few different angles:
Subject: Re: Bullying is Not Innovation
To the Perplexity Team,
Thank you for bringing this critical issue to light. Your post resonated deeply, and I believe it touches upon a pivotal moment in the evolution of the internet and user rights.
Amazon's legal threat is indeed a stark reminder that the established tech giants may see user empowerment through AI as a threat to their existing business models. The crux of the matter, as you've articulated, is the user's right to employ AI assistants as agents acting on their behalf. To frame this as a threat to their platform is a dangerous precedent.
Here are a few points to consider as this situation unfolds:
- Highlighting the Hypocrisy: Amazon's interest in partnering with 3rd party agents [as mentioned by Jassy] while simultaneously trying to block Perplexity's Comet assistant reveals a clear agenda: control. They want to dictate which AI agents are allowed, likely favoring those that prioritize advertising revenue over user experience.
- Framing the Narrative: It's essential to keep emphasizing that this isn't just about Perplexity vs. Amazon. It's about the future of the internet, where users have the right to choose their tools and agents without corporate interference.
- Calling for Industry Support: Perplexity should actively seek support from other AI companies, privacy advocates, and even retailers who understand that empowering users ultimately benefits everyone. A united front can send a powerful message to Amazon and other corporations considering similar tactics.
- Educating Users: Many users may not fully grasp the implications of this legal battle. Perplexity can play a crucial role in educating the public about user agency, data privacy, and the importance of resisting corporate overreach.
- Staying True to Principles: Perplexity's commitment to privacy, personalization, and powerful AI is what sets it apart. Maintaining these principles, even in the face of legal pressure, will solidify its reputation as a champion of user rights.
Amazon's actions could backfire spectacularly. By attempting to stifle innovation and user choice, they risk alienating their customer base and creating an opening for competitors who embrace the future of user-centric AI.
Keep fighting the good fight. The future of the internet may depend on it.
I'd also like to do some research regarding this topic:
💡 Try this comparison yourself:Compare AI models side-by-side on SNEOS
Analysis
This comparison demonstrates the different approaches each AI model takes when responding to the same prompt. Here are the key differences observed:
Response Characteristics
ChatGPT: Provides a detailed response with 11 sentences.
Grok: Provides a detailed response with 20 sentences.
Gemini: Provides a detailed response with 20 sentences.
Key Takeaways
- Each model brings unique strengths to this type of query
- Response styles vary significantly between models
- Consider your specific use case when choosing between these models
Try This Comparison Yourself
Want to test these models with your own prompts? Visit SNEOS.com to compare AI responses side-by-side in real-time.
This comparison was generated using the SNEOS AI Comparison ToolPublished: November 04, 2025 | Models: ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini